Teddy (left), and Sampson (right)

  • Cloudless ☼@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    In 2009, the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia released a five-year review of dog-bite injuries. The review states that 51 percent of attacks were made by pit bulls.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19644273/

    In 2009, another study was published by the American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. The study ran for 15 years and it has concluded that pit bulls, German Shepherds, and Rottweilers are among the most common breeds that cause fatal dog attacks in Kentucky State.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19696575/

    In 2011, the Annals of Surgery published a study, which concluded that Pitbull attacks lead to more expensive hospital bills, higher risk of death, and higher morbidity rates compared to other breeds of dogs.

    https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Abstract/2011/04000/Mortality,_Mauling,_and_Maiming_by_Vicious_Dogs.23.aspx

  • Ithorian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Last year the son of a good friend, with only 5 years, was attacked and murdered by the grandfather dog that knew him his entire life, he was playing with his sister and the dog… can you guess the breed? Yep, thats right. Fuck those dogs

  • PhillyA92@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    You’re dogs are cute, But I’m sticking with the numbers on this one. I don’t think any pits living right now should be put down, but I strongly believe we should stop breeding them entirely.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’m not sure any post in a ‘wholesome’ community should include the word ‘retaliation’. Retort? Sure. Response. Absolutely. Reply? Fine. But retaliation? Not exactly wholesome.

  • undercrust@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Wow, lots of people with strong feelings whose version of “I did my research!” is remembering what stories the newspapers wrote because they knew it would spark outrage and attract eyeballs, and hearsay on friend-of-a-friend stories.

    So called “bully breeds” are the best dogs I’ve ever met. I fucking love cuddling with those meatheads. Cane Corsos, Dobermans, and Rottweilers are amazing, loyal, and loving, too.

    I’ve been bitten and needed stitches from both a Chihuahua and a Poodle. My daughter was bit by a absolute shit of a Bichon, and my ex was bit by a Husky when she was a kid. Fuck those dogs we should outlaw and euthanize them all, right breed-banners? Or maybe it does indeed have to do a LOT with nurture, and very little with nature? (or in the case of my ex (according to her Mom) because she wouldn’t stop harassing the dog).

    However, I’ve met some nice poodles and chihuahuas and huskies too (not bichons though, little assholes), but I’m not so fucking dumb and shallow as to say we need to outlaw them all, just that owners should absolutely be responsible and liable for their pets’ behaviour.

    PS - OP your dogs are cute as hell. Look at those smiles!

    • Dr. Coomer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thank you, and yes, your absolutely right. Any dog is capable of violence, but I think the reason pitbulls have this reputation is because many people want them as an attack/defense dog and don’t actually know how to care for them in a way that keeps them calm.

      • undercrust@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Same could be said for Rotties, Dobermans, Shepherds, and so on. It’s not the dogs that are shitty; it’s the people that own them. Address that problem and leave the dogs alone FFS.

  • pfr@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’ll acknowledge that this particular breed may be responsible for the most aggressive dog attacks, but I’d also assume there’s a correlation between aggression in dogs and the environment they’re brought up in.

    It’s the nature vs nurture debate but for K9s. Both are probably legitimate factors. But I’d argue, give a pit bull a loving home and good training - something all dogs deserve - and they’ll never hurt a soul.

    Problem is, idiots with no respect for animals tend to seek out “tough” dog breeds and torture them until they’re ready too attack anyone and everyone. Fuck people. People=Shit.

  • Striker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Just wondering? How hard is it for some of you to say "aww cute, doggy"or something like that?

  • Lavitz@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Statistics by definition is presenting empirical data and that’s what most people think of when they hear statistics. Most scientists studying statistics actually spend much more of their time developing and studying methods of data collection rather than crunching numbers. The reason for this is you cannot have meaning statistics if the data set is not accurate. And I love you all and your experiences matter but they bear no scientific weight.

    4 out of 5 dentists agree that every time you see a static it’s complete and total bullshit. Flawed data collection leads to flawed results which leads to flawed conclusions. But people sure do get excited when numbers validate their biases.