Dwazoupp@lemmy.worldBanned to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · edit-22 days agoDaily reminder that Charlie Kirk argued AGAINST free school lunch for kids. The multimillionaire said no child is hungry. files.catbox.moevideomessage-square80linkfedilinkarrow-up1656arrow-down123file-text
arrow-up1633arrow-down1videoDaily reminder that Charlie Kirk argued AGAINST free school lunch for kids. The multimillionaire said no child is hungry. files.catbox.moeDwazoupp@lemmy.worldBanned to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · edit-22 days agomessage-square80linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAeonFelis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-218 hours agoHe just wanted the children to be thinner so that they could more easily hide under their desks during school shooting. Seems more reasonable a solution than gun control, don’t you think?
minus-squaresploder@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·17 hours agoCharlie Kirk did not give a single fuck about children, especially the ones taken away by gun violence in particular imo
He just wanted the children to be thinner so that they could more easily hide under their desks during school shooting. Seems more reasonable a solution than gun control, don’t you think?
Charlie Kirk did not give a single fuck about children, especially the ones taken away by gun violence in particular imo