Science journalists find ChatGPT is bad at summarizing scientific papers
arstechnica.com
LLM “tended to sacrifice accuracy for simplicity” when writing news briefs.
  • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.netEnglish
    4·
    5 months ago

    This is super interesting insight, thanks for sharing.

    " I think the scientists put up with it because as long as the conclusion is correct, they’re just happy to have anyone paying attention."

    I think you’ve hit the nail on the head with this