• rafoix@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      It is in no way the opposite of a monopoly. It is an oligopoly which seems to have a similar effect to a monopoly.

      • blitzen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        This one decision not to air something isn’t the example of monopoly, but the totality of the situation does exhibit monopolistic behavior.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          The network can’t have a monopoly because it’s reliant on affiliates. Affiliates can’t have a monopoly because of ownership limits.