Do you fap to gutted palestinian bodies that you have to see them in order to consider a platform good? You could’ve said anything, I mean literally anything else, I am sure you could find that, but you chose these examples?
Yes. Showing the actual reality of the genocide is incredibly important. I’m sure you’ve only seen the pictures of white sanitized body bags in your media to sanitize and paletize the suffering.
Starving kids. Palestinians blown up by the IDF. Combat footage. Anything that Western censor will never allow to be shown unless it’s October 7 or Ukraine.
Try post a Dropsitenews link on Lemmy.world see what happens.
It may be shocking for you to learn this, but most people don’t want to be complicit in distributing propaganda from a terrorist organization whose goal is to promote violence. If someone gets “radicalized” by this propaganda and does something violent they may be held liable.
Media sources generally don’t believe what a terrorist organization says at face value. They work to confirm the reports and if they can’t there’s a high probability that a group that celebrates massacring people is lying.
Understand that sometimes terrorist groups that are willing to kill people to further their cause are also capable of lying to further their cause. It takes a lot of time and effort to decipher which of the things Hamas is saying are lies and which are the truth. Responsible media organizations do that, irresponsible click-baity scammy organizations don’t. So sometimes you’ll see things reported by “alternative media” before it’s reported by mainstream media (after it’s confirmed) and sometimes the things reported by “alternative media” is never reported by mainstream media because it can’t be confirmed and is likely not true.
Is it censorship when someone is just being careful not to spread lies?
WHY ARE YOU FUCKERS ON THAT RACIST SEWER
Because the other platforms censor Palestine content much harder.
Bluesky and Mastodon are worse than Twitter. That’s a fact.
Examples?
Try finding footage of Hamas blowing up an IDF tank on Bluesky.
Try finding emanciated babies on Bluesky.
Try finding palestinian bodies with their guts bombed out on Bluesky.
Do you fap to gutted palestinian bodies that you have to see them in order to consider a platform good? You could’ve said anything, I mean literally anything else, I am sure you could find that, but you chose these examples?
Yes. Showing the actual reality of the genocide is incredibly important. I’m sure you’ve only seen the pictures of white sanitized body bags in your media to sanitize and paletize the suffering.
Here NSFL: https://xcancel.com/mediadot_/status/1941551101050036401
If Israel also made child porn on Xitter would you also post it here to “desanitize the genocide”?
This must have sounded a lot better in your mind.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phan_Thi_Kim_Phuc
You could’ve just said yes.
Bluesky and Mastodon censor Palestine content?
Never heard of Mastodon, an open standard, doing that. I don’t think they understand what they are saying.
Mastodon is basically only Mastodon.social
Multiple Lemmy users have attested to having their Palestine content censored on Mastodon.social. I never saw any good content on it either.
Yes.
Mastodon is like Lemmy in how anyone can host an instance.
What instances are blocking Palestine?
I am concerned what you consider “palestine content” then.
Starving kids. Palestinians blown up by the IDF. Combat footage. Anything that Western censor will never allow to be shown unless it’s October 7 or Ukraine.
Try post a Dropsitenews link on Lemmy.world see what happens.
So… straight up Hamas propaganda?
It may be shocking for you to learn this, but most people don’t want to be complicit in distributing propaganda from a terrorist organization whose goal is to promote violence. If someone gets “radicalized” by this propaganda and does something violent they may be held liable.
Media sources generally don’t believe what a terrorist organization says at face value. They work to confirm the reports and if they can’t there’s a high probability that a group that celebrates massacring people is lying.
Understand that sometimes terrorist groups that are willing to kill people to further their cause are also capable of lying to further their cause. It takes a lot of time and effort to decipher which of the things Hamas is saying are lies and which are the truth. Responsible media organizations do that, irresponsible click-baity scammy organizations don’t. So sometimes you’ll see things reported by “alternative media” before it’s reported by mainstream media (after it’s confirmed) and sometimes the things reported by “alternative media” is never reported by mainstream media because it can’t be confirmed and is likely not true.
Is it censorship when someone is just being careful not to spread lies?