If you require someone to simply immediately believe your lofty premise to continue a conversation, I question how genuine that conversation is.
I explained in detail the problems I saw with your, I believe, completely idealistic and unrealistic approach, and you kinda just went “nuh huh”. that doesnt seem in good faith at all.
I pretty clearly said that i dont think youre worth conversing with lmfao. Take your “good faith” and shove it. Ill continue organizing and radicalizing the homies and you can continue licking boots, and we’ll see who has the prettier smile in the end lmao
Well you cant do anything close to what im proposing with that point of view so i just didnt see a point to continuing the conversation.
If you require someone to simply immediately believe your lofty premise to continue a conversation, I question how genuine that conversation is.
I explained in detail the problems I saw with your, I believe, completely idealistic and unrealistic approach, and you kinda just went “nuh huh”. that doesnt seem in good faith at all.
I pretty clearly said that i dont think youre worth conversing with lmfao. Take your “good faith” and shove it. Ill continue organizing and radicalizing the homies and you can continue licking boots, and we’ll see who has the prettier smile in the end lmao
You are simply hurting the cause you pretend to support by ignoring the only system you have in place to solve it.
It is simply impossible to get the amount of people needed for what you are talking about organized.
You’d need more than the third of maga voters.
It is crazy you aggressively eschew pragmatism/liken it to boot licking. Absurd, naive, and counterproductive behaviour.
Like i said, not worth conversing with. Not with that attitude lmfao
You’ve been the only one bring incivility to this conversation.
you refused to acknowledge any of my points when you disagreed.
Meh meh meh meh mehmehmeh