• null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    20 hours ago

    To the surprise of absolutely no one Trump encounters no consequences as a result of his criminal behavior.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      To the surprise of most… Go back and find threads discussing the original ruling and notice how everyone was celebrating, and see how the voices saying nothing will come of it get downvoted. They do this on purpose to pacify the masses, and when everyone is distracted with the next shitty situation they take away the little victories they gave you and you’re too busy with the current scandal to worry about the broken legal system.

  • slate@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    1 day ago

    Struck down due to the 8th amendment, which reads, in its entirety:

    Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

    He was fined what he profitted from fraud that the judges agree he committed, plus interest. In what world is that excessive?

    So, if you’re going to steal, steal $500 million or more, because then the government can’t take it back since that would be an excessive fine.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      He was fined what he profitted from fraud that the judges agree he committed, plus interest. In what world is that excessive?

      Wow… i saw the headlines but didn’t realize this was the case. Not even punitive fines. Literally this is the ABSOLUTE MINIMUM it could be without fraud being profitable.

      • thanks AV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 day ago

        In the 323-page decision, Judge Moulton said that American voters had “obviously rendered a verdict” on Trump’s political career.

        “This bench today unanimously derails the effort to destroy his business,” the judge wrote.

        Judge says voters gave him that money fair and square

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          23 hours ago

          “This bench today unanimously derails the effort to destroy his business,” the judge wrote.

          The entire business was fraudulent, top to bottom, it SHOULD be dismantled. That’s like a judge whining that it’s unfair to put Al Capone out of business.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        24 hours ago

        without fraud being profitable.

        Actually… scratch that.

        With this fine, it actually was profitable. Interest is always lower than what someone could actually earn on the funds if they just dropped it into some broad market ETF, or reinvested it to commit more fraud.

    • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It’s ok, they just set a precident that if you steal $100 million or more, you won’t have to pay it back because ots more than your worth, and is excessive. Cool, anyone up to rob a bank?

  • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    HE’S A FUCKING MULTI-BILLIONAIRE!!! And now he just gets to walk away. What a fucking joke, our system is.

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        24 hours ago

        He’s almost certainly back into at least multi-millionaire status. The reason is that he’s been grifting the hell out of the office of the President. The cryptocoin, for example, was money in his pocket; yes, it crashed in price almost immediately, but that was already after he took their money. Or perhaps more likely, had it as a method of backdoor bribes.

        If he’s not at least a multi-millionaire after all that grift, then I have to wonder just how bad he is at this.

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          23 hours ago

          He wasn’t trying to make money on the crypto itself, he knew that was a dog. He owns the trading platform, so he made money on every trade when they bought in, and then made money on every trade as they panic-sold it on the way down.

          That little scam reportedly made him over a billion. Then he did it again with Melania crypto.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      23 hours ago

      He was deep in the hole when he was first elected. Being in the government has been very profitable for him. A recent report had his businesses already profiting over $3.4 billion since his most RECENT inauguration.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Inching closer to Russia every day.

    This is going to be such an awful place to live by the end of our lives.

  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The court made very clear that Trump, this feckless spawn, and the Trump organizing committed fraud. It just ruled that the judgement was excessive. They’re still guilty. There will still be a penalty. It will just be lower.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Note that the article’s embedded tweet by a right-wing rag that it’s a “federal” court is wrong. That implies it would go to the Supreme Court, which of course is in Trump’s corner.

    No, this is the 1st Appellate Division in NY state court, which is the first appellate level above the Supreme Court (in NY, the “Supreme Court” is the lowest general court level).

    Per James, it’s getting appealed to the highest New York state court, the NY Court of Appeals. Trump could still challenge in federal court due to the 8th Amendment argument, but this is not over by any means and may very well be reversed again at the Court of Appeals.

    In a statement released after the ruling, James stated her office’s intention to appeal it.

    “The First Department today affirmed the well-supported finding of the trial court: Donald Trump, his company, and two of his children are liable for fraud,” James said.

    “The court upheld the injunctive relief we won, limiting Donald Trump and the Trump Organization officers’ ability to do business in New York. It should not be lost to history: yet another court has ruled that the president violated the law, and that our case has merit.

    “We will seek appeal to the Court of Appeals and continue to protect the rights and interests of New Yorkers.”

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    Aren’t fraud penalties supposed to be excessive? Like if I could save $20 with fraud, and the fine was a reasonable $20, it wouldn’t just be an ineffective deterrent. It would be a bad financial decision to not commit fraud.

    • Sabata@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not in the US. That would bankrupt half of our corporate overlords and upset shareholders.

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        24 hours ago

        There were lots of US stories about “oh, this lady got millions for spilling coffee on her” (with no mention of just how bad those burns were and how unreasonable the temperature settings on McDonald’s coffee machines actually were. This spurned a bunch of laws and rulings that put limits on liability.

        The refrain of “they just wanted money” resonated with people. People who don’t recognize that punishing companies on their balance sheet is often the only method capitalism offered to ever rectify these things.

        So what I’m saying is, Luigi did nothing wrong.

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Yeah, from now on, if anyone negatively speaks of the victim of McDonald’s boiling hot coffee, I just say this, “two words: fused labia”.

          Either they are too stupid to understand and therefore not worth my time, or they understand and are horrified.

          Free Luigi.

          Guillotine the rich.

  • JHRD1880@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Because of course. As soon as he won the election it was crystal clear that all his legal troubles would either vanish or be postponed for so long that they ultimately wouldn’t matter anymore.