That’s the neat part: we don’t! A majority of our weapons and tech come from the US and their producers will gladly give the American government all of our data and/or remotely disable our systems if asked.
There’s no political will to divest from American tech and manufacturing despite significant national interest. Even the dumbest Albertan secessionist would agree that blindly trusting a foreign corporation is not the best idea, but here we are, with F-35s we don’t actually own and using a custom instance of Microsoft 365 called Defence 365. 🤦♀️
I’m sick of hearing about increased defence spending that doesn’t reduce dependence on the fascist country south of us. If we’re not pivoting away from American shit, there’s no reason other than corruption to increase spending. Pivoting away from US should be priority #1
Finland is also facing an adversary that’s been a bit more strategic, and took some very hard political concessions during the Cold War in order to remain a separate country. And now they’ve joined NATO anyway.
I mean, sure, Finland-style mass mobilisation and fortress mentality is a great place to start. But, I don’t see it replacing a nuclear umbrella, either our own or from someone who already has one.
Nuke.
Clearly by putting our elbows in the air, that’s what Carney told me at least
OP correctly identifies US as the threat to Canada.
Canada cannot remain a member of NATO if it understands this threat. Canada and other NATO colonies will not declare war on US when they invade Greenland. An invasion with only purpose to gain closer proximity to threaten EU continent militarily. Similarly, NATO will not intervene to prevent a US invasion of Canada. The colonies are programmed to be pathethic loser sycophants to US empire, and to always appease all of its evil.
NORAD exists to protect the US from Russia. Arctic is only threatened by US. Any imagined threat from Russia against Canada exists ONLY because Canada is part of demonic subhuman axis of warmongering and diminishment of Russia. NORAD services for US protection must be generously paid for by US, or dismantled.
The Finland model is ironic. Sure, mandatory military service to prepare for counter insurgency on vast land area is a protection strategy. But Finland’s historic protection is not being part of demonic subhuman axis of warmongering alliance, which it just joined. It is vile propaganda to consider Russia’s military interventions of the last 15 years unprovoked expansionism. Georgia, was a CIA installed Ukrainian nazi President who provoked war on the first day, and as war criminal and convicted of corruption in Georgia was rewarded with being the current mayor of Odessa. It is categorically unacceptable to fail to understand US/NATO/Ukraine as 100% responsible for instigating current war.
OP also applauds Canada’s NATO commitment to 5% of GDP for demonic subhuman axis warmongering subservience to US geopolitics. You cannot understand US as the threat to Canada, but continue supporting social destruction of Canada to divert any remaining wealth to purchasing US weapons for US force amplification purposes. By using this as punchline of article, this is yet more CIA treason of Canadians to blindly support massive US weapons purchases regardless of what military spending is actually relevant to our defense.