• TryingSomethingNew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nice article on Meshtastic. The problem is that, like anything, the actual distance is a lot more dependent on line of sight and the actual mesh existing. Which means we’d need a LOT more people to adopt these and put up repeaters for them to be useful. Which is doable, but not cheap.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      At that point, given the extremely small bandwidth, we might as well just use a massive wifi, everyone already has the required hardware for that instead of producing more trash for a pretty much non-existing use case.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Some people already are

        https://map.nycmesh.net/

        But the point of LoRa is in the name, long range. Wifi barely reaches outside my house. Also a WiFi mesh is dependent on a variety of complicated and proprietary networks and systems while meshtastic is entirely independent.