Title.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Anything to shorten it sounds good to me.

    My idea has been that copyright shouldn’t be automatic. It needs to be registered, and renewed every 2 to 5 years. And each renewal costs twice what the last one did. Start off super cheep maybe even free. Then $5 for the first renewal, doubling each time. Eventually it becomes too expensive to bother; Even for billion dollar franchises.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      So a system that removes all the power from individual authors and puts it firmly in the hands of big corporations with deepest pockets? Nah.

          • Steve@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Not when they’re profiting off the copyrighted work.
            Regardless of being owned by a person or corp. A specific copyright will reach a point where it’s not bringing in enough money to justify the expense of renewal. Corps aren’t in the habit of holding onto things that aren’t profitable. People tend to do so longer than corps.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Those fees won’t pay for the cost of registering all these copyrights. Currently the government doesn’t need to get involved until there’s a suit, and then they get court fees. Everybody registering their first 2 to 5 years of copyright would be a massive burden.

      Also, at every 5 years you’re only up to a few hundred bucks at 40 years. Definitely needs to be on the lower side.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Registering doesn’t need to cost much. It could be largely automated.
        And the government will get plenty of money later on from the big ticket copyrights.
        And the government isn’t supposed to be profitable in itself any way. So that doesn’t matter much.

        And yah, personally I’d root for for a year or two. But to get this system in place, that would likely have to be compromised on. 5 years is the long edge of worth doing at all.

    • TootSweet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Anything to shorten it sounds good to me.

      So say we all.

      In the U.S., a few years ago, GOP Senator Josh Hawley, one of the speakers who helped incite the January 6th insurrection, introduced a bill to make the term of Copyright 28 years with optionally one renewal for an additional 28 years.

      And, it’s so weird to me that I could agree with him on anything really.

      Mind you, he introduced that bill in an effort to punish Disney for being too “woke”. And the bill didn’t go anywhere. But I’d let the MAGA nuts use such a bill as an opportunity to crow for a few minutes about their victory over strong woman protagonists or whatever if it got us more reasonable copyright terms. (And honestly that’s too long, but it’s a hell of a lot better than the bullshit we have now.)

      Also, fuck Sonny Bono.

      • vsg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Steamboat Willie was released almost a hundred years ago but only got into public domain last year. 95 years of copyright is overkill.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          10 years plus an option for a 10 year extension is plenty.

          Copyright should only apply to other individuals and companies trying to collect income (not just profit, making any money) from copying as well. The whole original idea about protecting the creator from being easily copied was a decent idea, and really only makes sense as useful to society in that context.

          And yes, I am in favor of every work of art being in the public domain within two decades. That is plenty of time to benefit from exclusivity, they can create additional art or do some kind of promotional work or something else to keep making money off the fact that they created something that deserved to be exclusive.