This summer, wildfires have caused evacuations across Canada and recently forced thousands of people to flee their homes in Newfoundland and Labrador.

Some of the biggest impacts are being felt in the Prairies. In Manitoba, authorities recently issued evacuation orders for 15,000 people, mostly in the province’s north. Many evacuees are brought to larger cities like Winnipeg, overwhelming hotels and emergency housing.

In Canada, climate-driven migration is often imagined as a distant threat that affects others in the world. But these evacuations foreshadow a future where internal displacement becomes a regular feature of Canadian life—and where cities must rethink how they plan for disruption.

Events like the 88,000-person evacuation from Fort McMurray, Alta. in 2016 and the destruction of Lytton, B.C. in 2021 show how fast rural populations can be displaced.

  • hanrahan@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    While I dont disagree with you, this aeticle is about internal migration though. Where do you accomodate 15,000 evacuees from a fire etc.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      By not fucking the real estate market so badly that multiple grown ass adults are splitting rent on condos.

      Either we build more memorial hockey arenas via corporate sponsorship or we finally mandate municipal housing corporations, and build affordable housing instead of profitable shoeboxes.

      • LucySchmoocy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        You aren’t absorbing what this article is saying. This isn’t about climate refuge immigration helping the Canadian economy. This is saying that the Canadians are the climate refuges when they are evacuated from where they live because of wildfires.

        I am 100% for affordable housing, but this article is actually pointing out that all housing is vulnerable because wildfires are endangering where people live. Do you think housing will get more affordable when it’s burning down? When the trees used to make the houses burn down? Ignoring this aspect of the situation is unwise.

        I don’t mean to dismiss or undermine your concerns, because they are very valid. Maybe you’d feel better served in a discussion about the economy instead of climate change. (Edit:sorry I forgot that this is collapse—my apologies!!)

        • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          multiple grown ass adults are splitting rent on condos.

          If adults could afford their own houses than there would be significantly more capacity for people to stay with friends and family instead of having to take refuge at hockey arenas.

          • LucySchmoocy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 days ago

            Oh, I would like a nice deck chair on the Titanic too. But the more important conversation is that we’re on the Titanic, rather than the quality of the seat cushions, is it not? Maybe not.

            Exactly a week ago, a wildfire started 5km from where I live and I prepared to evacuate. Luckily it didn’t come to that for me, but there were people in my town who did have to evacuate. I’d rather stay with people I know than in a hockey arena, but I’d take a hockey arena over burning to death in a fire. It’s all relative.