• Auster@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 days ago

    Dunno if it indeed is AI, though it does look a bit uncanny.

    But if it is, the filter sounds possible, as then it looks like some DOS-era digital drawing.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah, and I’m not aware of an ai that gets pixel art pixel perfect. I don’t see any distorted pixels

      • Leonixster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        13 days ago

        Frog on the left cauldron has 2 fingers, frog in the air right in the middle has 4, the rest seem to have 3 fingers per hand and foot.

        That’s not conclusive evidence, but I think it’s worth mentioning

      • stray@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        ChatGPT/Dall-E is fully capable of having generated this.

        e: I became curious whether it would recognize its own output.

        From looking at it, this looks like a stylized illustration or meme-style cartoon, not a natural photograph.

        Illuminating.

        It did direct me to a site called imgdetector.ai though, which found 99% probability of AI generation on both this and my test image.

        • the_mighty_kracken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          Thanks for the website link. I got the same 99% probability rating on this image, and a 1% on four unrelated, human made images that I checked.