• алсааас [she/they]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Once again, the non-revisionist non-reformist internationalist socialist position is to not take sides in a conventional inter-imperialist (read inter-capitalist) war.
    Ukraine de facto acts as the proxy of the West, while Russia is a regional imperialist power.
    Both are capitalist governments fighting each other over their respective interests, there is nothing proletarian about Ukraine; the international proletariat belongs to no country…

    Anti-colonial/liberation wars are another topic. Critical support is warranted there, even if it isn’t a proletarian movement fighting them.

    All the liberals masquerading as leftists always seem to forget “No war but class war!” whenever it’s convenient for them; so please eat your veggies read your theory…

    • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      7 days ago

      You’re so steeped in theory and strategy that you’ve forgotten to defend the universal human right to self-determination. Ukrainians do not consent to being governed by Russia, and that is reason enough for me to side with them.

      • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Mate, the ukranian government is conscripting people. The government isn’t fighting for the people, it’s willing to torture people that would prefer to leave or surrender.

        Don’t confuse countries for the people that live in them. If the Ukrainian government hadn’t been bouncing between corruption scandals and supported people leaving who aren’t interested in fighting things would be different.

        Governments are not the people and do not represent the people. This is a proxy war bloodbath.

        Western Europeans are enthusiastic about it because the thought of reducing the number of Slavs in the world makes them salivate.

          • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            In political science, a proxy war is an armed conflict where at least one of the belligerents is directed or supported by an external third-party power.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_war

            The russian federation under Putin is persuing Putin’s own objectives. Ukrain is being supported by the EU, the usa, and protectorates such as Australia.

            I think this is beyond debate? If you feel a need to establish consensus on these basic details then please indicate so. If you were merely mistaken about the definition of a proxy war then please, for clarity, say so.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              So invading other countries is fine as long as those countries have allies supporting them, on the grounds that it’s a “proxy” war?

              • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                5 days ago

                That’s exactly what I said. Well done, have a gold star for achieving 7 year old reading comprehension.

                Actually subtract that star because you’re too damn proud to admit you were mistaken, which is approximately 2 year old developmental level.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  So we’re back where we started, only now you’ve insulted me for not supporting Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Russia could have ended this at any time by just leaving Ukraine be.

                  • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 days ago

                    Let’s trace your shifting goalposts, since you seem to have the memory of a goldfish:

                    You initially implied Russia was a proxy for someone, questioning the term “proxy war.”

                    When provided with the basic definition and the clear fact that Ukraine is the primary entity receiving direct external support to fight a war against a larger power, you had no substantive counter.

                    So now, you abandon the entire factual premise of the discussion and swerve into a moralistic declaration about the invasion being wrong.

                    You attempted a “gotcha” on terminology, failed, and now pretend the original debate was always about the morality of invasion. No one argued that invading was good.

                    Your insistence on reducing everything to “Russia bad, therefore Ukraine good” is exactly the liberal masquerade alsaaas called out. You conflate opposing Russian imperialism with endorsing the Ukrainian state or NATO’s project. You cannot hold two thoughts at once: that Russia is an imperialist aggressor and that the Ukrainian government is a corrupt, conscripting capitalist regime fighting a proxy war for Western interests that do not align with those of its own or the international proletariat.

    • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      “No war but class war” doesn’t mean you cannot fight or support a defensive war.

      If it does, it is an irredeemably stupid position.

      The non-revisionist, non-reformist, internationalist socialist position can eat dicks.

      If there is an imperialist aggressor invading another country, then the MORAL position is to side against the aggressor. Because regardless of how you feel about the governments (which, fuck all governments, so what’s the point in making that distinction?), the civilians will be feeling the brunt of the war.

      There is an imperialist aggressor and it is Russia.

      • 🏴حمید پیام عباسی🏴@crazypeople.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        The oblasts involved in this war want to join Russia and voted to join in 2014 after the Ukrainians kicked out the Russian friendly government. They voted to join Russia because they feared that the Ukrainian government was going to oppress them for being Russian speaking ethnic Russians. They were right, In the years between 2014 and 2022 they fought a civil war to leave Ukraine and were not allowed to and Russia intervened. Most of the people living there moved to Russia.

        The only irredeemably stupid position is the person who just takes into account 2022 and after and not looking at the whole picture. You have no fucking idea what you are talking about.

        • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          7 days ago

          Sorry, I can’t hear you over your staunch adherence to revisionism in favor of authoritarian imperialist powers masquerading as socialist or communist.

        • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          And you see zero problems with those elections? No problem with no other country in the world recognising them, no international observers, no voter lists and even with all of that they didn’t vote to join Russia they voted for independence.

          • 🏴حمید پیام عباسی🏴@crazypeople.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            But if they voted to stay in Ukraine you would have accepted them?

            no international observers

            Neither do the US elections, do you accept those?

            From my perspective the US and the EU are by far the most evil places on earth that have directly colonized where I live and oppressed the entire world for 400 years and those are the people complaining the loudest. Why should I trust any english speaker that they are in the right or care about anyone or anything except extracting wealth from the rest of us? You people literally have 0 good faith or moral high ground. I don’t view the Russians as more evil as the EU. Europe, including Russia which is part of Europe, is filled with literal devils.

            • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              If you think “the EU and the US are BY FAR the most evil places on earth” then you are just delusional and your opinion is irrelevant

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      when you choose the side of non-intervention you take the position of the oppressor. russia is committing a genocide in Ukraine. sure, they’re both capitalist regimes, but one is clearly the imperial colonizer. call me “the liberal” again if you must, but your understanding of political theory is incomplete if you don’t see Ukraine’s self defense as a war of resistance.

      standing aside and letting russia win does not bring anyone closer to The Revolution. what brings us closer to liberation is supporting groups like Destroy the Lines and Sibir Corps (which the US refuses to support for being leftist russian groups) that are coordinating with Ukrainian military forces

    • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Russia invaded Ukraine. Just like Palestine, it it has a right to defend its sovereignty (albeit Palestine has ~80 years of a right to do this, compared to Ukraine’s ~15).

      Remember that working class people are suffering from these capitalist wars. They did not choose this

      Edit: Also, how is Russia’s invasion of Ukraine not imperialist?

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          7 days ago

          If that were the whole truth you would have a point (at least for Donetsk and Luhansk, not all of Ukraine), but the extent to which Russia was involved in the separatist movement calls their popular support into question. It’s not all that different from how the US gives support to dissident groups in countries it’s interested in destabilizing, except in scale.

          I think it’s also worth noting that the pro-Russia separatists are far-right extremists, which I think is quite an inconvenient fact for Russia given their “de-Nazification” justification for invading Ukraine.