Something written had to exist in order to be read, so writing is at least a second older than reading.

  • naught101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    12 days ago

    No. You can read signs. Like foot prints, or fire scars. Or you can count actually objects before you invent tallying.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      An individual person can learn to read before they learn to write, and that’s almost always the case. But the very, very first person to ever do either of those things wrote before he read.

      • jaaake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        The very first person to write was doing so with the intent of it being read. They didn’t make marks that they didn’t understand and then later discover their meaning. Writing makes no sense without reading. These two things happened in unison, one does not predate the other.