Ohh I think I see what you are missing. “To the right of Ruby” doesn’t mean “the one card to the right”. It means every card to the right in the same row. So it’s not just talking about Stella, but also Uma and Tina. Uma and Tina are both Pam’s neighbours.
Maybe I’m just going senile. But that really doesn’t make any sense. Stella is not Pam’s neighbor. How do you make that Olympic level leap of deduction?
Edit: you asked for no spoilers, I hope this is okay. Kind of hard to explain the logic while avoiding all spoilers.
Tap for spoiler
Specifically, how is Stella Pam’s neighbor?
Stella isn’t Pam’s neighbour, maybe it would help if you explained why you’re asking this?
The very first clue.
Why do you think it’s saying that Stella is Pam’s neighbour?
I am trying to not be rude
Can you explain it with words?
No one to the right of Ruby is Pam’s neighbor. Am I tripping? Like how is everyone else getting this but me‽
This is a legit question. I feel like I’m experiencing a stroke in slow motion.
Ohh I think I see what you are missing. “To the right of Ruby” doesn’t mean “the one card to the right”. It means every card to the right in the same row. So it’s not just talking about Stella, but also Uma and Tina. Uma and Tina are both Pam’s neighbours.
The first clue says explicitly that the next person is Pam’s neighbor.
My first screenshot shows that the next person is very much not.
It doesn’t say that the next person is Pam’s neighbour at all, actually. Just that Pam only has one innocent neighbour, to the right of Ruby.
Ok, I appreciate your effort. But please expand on how I am to deduct that given the first clue?
The first clue gives two pieces of info:
That means:
Tap for spoiler
The second innocent is NOT Pam’s neighbour
Maybe I’m just going senile. But that really doesn’t make any sense. Stella is not Pam’s neighbor. How do you make that Olympic level leap of deduction?