FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world to Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world · 4 days agoTruthpastelemmy.worldimagemessage-square115linkfedilinkarrow-up11.02Karrow-down13file-text
arrow-up11.01Karrow-down1imageTruthpastelemmy.worldFlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world to Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square115linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareatomicorange@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoBut if butter can be produced in abundant habitat like the midwest prairie instead of threatened species-dense places like Borneo’s jungle, I’d prefer to go with the higher land use but ultimately less ecologically destructive option.
minus-squarenormis@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoSure, it’s an alternative. It’s also much much more expensive and less healthy than palm oil (butter has more saturated fats and cholesterol).
But if butter can be produced in abundant habitat like the midwest prairie instead of threatened species-dense places like Borneo’s jungle, I’d prefer to go with the higher land use but ultimately less ecologically destructive option.
Sure, it’s an alternative. It’s also much much more expensive and less healthy than palm oil (butter has more saturated fats and cholesterol).