Jets flying low today then eh?

Electricity is only so profitable. And if it was so easy to spin up power to meet their demand, but clearly that didn’t happen, and is effecting residents.

Yes, the argument is about spending money to migrate, because how else do we decouple the single points of failure, if not to migrate away?

Remember, this is a capatistic hellscape. Everything is about money.

Sure, but how much money is that worth to an individual company? Because migration is not easy or cheap. And your not getting more reliability…

Why? What value does Bitcoin mining bring to BC?

That’s… That’s the entire joke. Is that you don’t own it.

Did you miss my point?

Why would a company move away from AWS?

Because everyone has outages…

Why should companies invest tens of thousands of dollars to move?

Its funny how colonizers assumed “land back” means “treat us the way we treated you” and not “return care, stewardship, and independence back to the indigenous members”.

Okay, you know those have outages too right?

Like sure, it wouldn’t be all together like this, but that’s also not a reasonable ask for a lot of big cloud customers without huge investments for not actually anything extra reliability.

Can you name a more reliable alternative? With citations?

Because every major cloud provider has outages. On prem clouds also have outages. Everyone does.

A/B: citation needed

C: Only if you believe their quality of life is dependent on being Canada, even against their own wishes.

The only way it happens is a referendum. So it will be clearly the will of the people. (Also ignoring the fact the land is technically owned by the natives).

Also, have you been to Alberta? I grew up there. It may not be a vast majority, but it’s far from a loud small minority.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/alberta-janet-brown-may-2025-poll-separation-sentiment-1.7544074

3 in 10 think we should seperate, up from 20% in 2022

Headphones is a good start…

Like yes,

But my MP, or any number of MPs aren’t responsible for the day to day operations is my point…

I ultimately agree with you that Canada Post shouldn’t be a business.

But for everyone saying it is, then the business leaders are responsible for its failure. Which to me means it should be under MORR control of the federal government.

Who would you propose? Do you think Mark Carney is sitting there and makes every day decision s at Canada Post?

The Nazis are a completely different story. It wasn’t that they saw Jews as a cost or as objects, it’s that they saw them as less than objects, they viewed them as actively threatening the country.

I didn’t say that’s where it ended, it starts with stripping people’s humanity away by thinking of them as a number in your record books. Just like your suggesting.

As in, this was active hate, not apathy.

Your going to straight face tell me that this isn’t what tump is doing? Rounding up immigrants and trans people as antifa?

It’s not apathy right now. It’s active hate. Go to any protest and see the right wingers with their attitude. See the Israelites in the US loose their mind on people standing up for Palestinians.

I assume you’re talking about gun rights?

No. Human Rights.

When the ‘left’ calls for and protests for not killing of black (see what Kyle Rittenhouse did), Muslims, immigrants, trans people, ect… It’s always shut up no one cares.

And the GOP only has power, so long as the people that vote for them support them. And they elected a Nazi crew, so yes, my problem is with the people who voted for this hate.

First off, Canada Post is a service not a busisnes. Do we expect direct profits from the trans Canada highway?

Also, bill C58 still isn’t the topic at hand.

Im sorry but I need a verb there.

Nice whataboutism…

Says nothing about what’s actually tabled here…

I think it makes logical sense. They own a business, so they see everything as a cost, and that includes employee benefits. They’re merely voting for their self interests.

Can you see how dehumanizing that is? Viewing people as cost?

This is how Nazis start by the way, not viewing people as people

Employees are still people. Business should take care of people, not the other way arround.

That’s their purpose. Conservatives are pretty universally against change/in favor of reverting change, while liberals want more change. Sometimes you want one more than the other, depending on what’s going on.

Your assumption is that every side serves a purpose. But when we say “hey we shouldn’t kill people” and the answer is “shut up libtard” can you see how they don’t have a “purpose” other than to spread hate?

And I’m not gonna copy and paste the rest of them comment.

I know who my problem with is, is it’s just hate. Not exclusively politicians, anyone who wants to seee dead.

Can I just say, get fucked? Must be nice when your existence isnt political.

No, it’s not ethical.

It’s unacceptable to do that to humans in a ‘modern Western’s’ clinical ethics setting.

I agrue it’s still unethical to do to animals…