You’re intentionally conflating murder with a war.
When both sides are irrational to a point where aggression, defence, self-defence and preservation blurs, there’s no morally good or evil anymore, it’s all shit.
Charlie Kirk didn’t have a gun pointed at his murderer, as far as I’m aware he did never kill anyone or ordered the killing of anyone. Your comparison is not only flawed, it’s intentionally made up to compare a single person who just engaged in dialogue and used words with two populations who have basically sworn to exterminate their respective opponent (to achieve “peace in our times” as it seems).
It seems like your trying to establish that some murders for wrongthink are ok, it just needs to be Nazi. Isn’t this what you really want so say?
Murder is OK if somone is perceived as homophobic, transphobic and engaged in so called hate speech?
Well, in this case I have some news for you about the population of Gaza, Hamas and Palestine in particular and the vast majority or muslims in general.
Are you comparing the murder of someone with the wrong opinion to an ongoing war that happened because irreconcilable religious differences and mutual drive to total extermination?
You’re wrong. Murder is always wrong. Celebrating murder is wrong. You can disagree with someone that’s all good and fine, you can take legal action if you opponent cross the legal border, fine. You can use self defense if your opponent crosses even that border.
But the one thing that is unacceptable under all circumstances is to a) murder someone because of words b) celebrating this murder.
You can, of course, disagree. That makes you a horrible person, I would still not kill you or celebrate of someone else would do it.
Why bring the orange man into the discussion? Is this all you can think of? Orange man bad? Well guess what: I’m not an US citizen and I don’t care about the CheetoMan.
Hate speech? What is that? Can you provide a proper definition for that. Speech is either free and allowed or it fella under specific sections of criminal law. If it’s legal I don’t care if it incommodates someone. They are just words.
Murder is a defined personal act that is more or less similar in most, but not all, jurisdictions.
War is a ln act between nations, states, collectives, combatants, soldiers and mercenaries.
You’re intentionally conflating 2 vastly different scenarios and I’m not falling for it.