This is sort of how putting hits on people actually works or has in certain scenes.
You don’t sign a contract or put out a bounty (unless you’re the state, that’s illegal), you just let everyone know that you’d hypothetically pay whomever killed the person you want offing.
As a bonus you can then say you were just joking (ofc that risks you being offed too)
AI could help editors translate from other languages, but beyond that, it’s an inefficient mess that Wikipedia doesn’t need, plus given how much of AI is just regurgitating Wikipedia, It’ll give itself mad cow AI disease.
That’s a real issue, but the article uses it as a jumping of point to get for AI slop.
Wake up Lemmy, it’s time for your daily, Wikipedia should have more AI slop article.
Let’s make it 1400 words this time, and make sure to mention that younger generations watch Ticktok, but ignore that most TickTok slop is just people summerizing Wikipedia articles.
This sounds a lot like every framework, 20 years ago you could have written that about rails.
Which IMO makes sense because if code isn’t solving anything interesting then you can dynamically generate it relatively easily, and it’s easy to get demos up and running, but neither can help you solve interesting problems.
Which isn’t to say it won’t have a major impact on software for decades, especially low-effort apps.
I sometimes wonder if Qmail had had a clear license, if Gmail would have destroyed the self-hosted mail ecosystem so thoroughly.
I think a lot of engineers underestimate the amount of non-technical effort that goes into running platforms with users.
It’s a shame I think there are some really interesting problems that a less profit driven dating app but currently anything without a big marketing budget isn’t going to have the userbase to support it.
Sounds like stuff Stalman wrote about 45 years ago, are windows users really that far behind?
This has been true for a long time, CPU sockets don’t last long enough to make upgrades worth it, unless you are constantly upgrading. Whenever i’ve built a “futureproof” desktop with a mid-high end GPU, by the time I hit performance problems I needed a new motherboard to fit the new CPU anyway. Only really upgradable components are storage and ram, but you can do that in your laptop too.
The main advantage of Desktops is still that you get much more performance for your money and can decide where it goes if you build it yourself.
I don’t think they had any way to refuse an illegal order.
They could literally just not carry out the order, that’s why the CCP brought in out of town troops. I don’t know the structure of ICE but it seems they are doing the same, troops from Texas and Arizona are more likely to shoot Minisottans than Minisottan troops, and I suspect they would do the same if they deployed the military.
It won’t be their neighbors though it’ll be troops shipped in from the other side of the country just like in China.
Civil wars require 2 sides capable of taking power.
People forget that labor unions were a major factor in Tiananmen Square, US labor unions are not a credible threat to take over so don’t need to be put down as brutally.
Modular computing always seems to fall victim to Moore’s law/similar, everything core get so much better every 5 years, that by the time you want to refresh anything, it’s usually time to upgrade the whole thing.
Periferals are nice but USB is already a multivendor connector standard and if the choice is 3d printing cases or trusting a vendor to exist in 10 years I’m betting on 3d printers for now.
Hope I’m wrong but this isn’t the first time I’ve seen a project like this.
At the end of the day the n900 was the ultimate portable Linux machine, but it died because within 10 years you could do all of that on an android device AND have a decent phone too.
SpaceX isn’t public so 9-5s will just buy TSLA instead.
Also thanks too Moore’s “Law”, pretty much anything launched will have 1/2 the processing power of something on the ground of equivalent size every 2 years.
Part of the success of cloud hosting is that thanks to Moore’s law companies were hesitant to buy hardware only to have it quickly become outdated*.
*cloud servers are actually pretty expensive so it really didn’t work out like this, but by the time that was obvious, the advantage of cloud was you had support for aaS Software built in (e.g Database, load balancing, caching, etc), and downstream of that is the death of open source vendors being able to get by selling support, but I’m sure that won’t have any negative effects 🙄.
Not a space expert but in v1.5 isn’t the center of mass being unaligned with the center of drag going to cause issues over time?
Lol, either these won’t be able to cool themselves or they will pump out heat straight into the upper atmosphere, which seems like a bad idea (I honestly don’t know enough but I suspect we simply don’t have the data to know what long term negative effects it will have)
Also just like Starlink this is a really dumb way to solve any problem other than how to inflate SpaceX valuations.
Now the lie that Starlink is resistant to censorship has been exposed twice (Ukraine & Iran), this is just the test Elon Grift.
Ships already sailed but shouldn’t AI generated things just be considered derivative of their training set?
I don’t know how that works for images/video, but for code that means if it’s trained on GPL code the resulting code would have to be GPL and the liability is on the people distiributing AI generated code.
This also makes commerical use of AI generated anything complicated while allowing personal use under the current state of non-enforceablity.