• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 23rd, 2024

help-circle

  • You do not acquire power by handing it over to liberals. That quite in the contrary depowers us more.

    As I said we need our own mass parties that are lead by us, not liberal parties or movements.

    Take a look at other countries. In the UK Corbyn is currently forming his own party and drawing in great numbers after he was slandered out of Labour leadership.

    In Germany Sarah Wagenknecht, long term former leader of the communist platform within the left party, is forming her own populist mass party.

    In France the new popular front has been formed under left and not liberal leadership and won the elections.

    Joining fold with the democrats is not building your own mass line. It makes you a collaborator in building a mass line for liberals.

    Also dealing with class enemies is only something that can be truly done once you’ve consolidated power. Then it doesn’t matter how many of them there are as long as you have the means to hold onto power and decimate them. Every revolution needs its revolutionary terror to take care of counter-revolutionaries.

    The goal is not to take part and win in bourgeois elections. That is systematically impossible actually. Taking part in those elections only servers as a platform to reach more people. You don’t need an actual majority for a successful revolution or coup. The Bolsheviks did not have the majority if you look at the first Russian elections after the overthrow of the Tsar, yet they still won the civil war.



  • Ignorance is no excuse in the court of law. It should be no different for ideological matters. Liberals choose to become class traitors or were already class enemies by being born not into the working class. They should suffer the consequences of that choice.

    Also we’re not just talking about individual people but a political party. It doesn’t matter who the voters are, the party leadership is class enemies, they aren’t working class, the party itself is designed as capitalist party. No compromise should ever be made with those. As quoted before we have nothing in common with the cause of the class enemy. Ever.

    I think you’re misunderstanding the purpose of a mass line or rather what purpose it serves for us. A mass line that is not lead by Marxists will ultimately benefit those who are not Marxists the most. That is a bad deal for us. Mass lines only work with a communist party in power already.

    Take a look into recent history with the Occupy Wallstreet protests for example. They all amounted to nothing and fizzled out because they were “liberalised”.

    Lastly the vanguard doesn’t fight the public body. It’s not what I propose either. The public body is not liberals. Those are a parasite inside the public body that needs to be removed. You’re following the enemy’s logic by equating liberalism with the people.


  • Calling bears predictable is something an overconfident documentary actor would do. A bear can at any moment decide to just rip you apart. Any “docile” zoo bear can still decide to just shred their keeper at some point.

    But that’s enough about the metaphor. The point was choosing between certain death and a human with all the possibilities that entails.

    It wouldn’t just be caution to choose death in that situation. It’s paranoia to assume that any random man will just do horrible things to you. Going through life with that paranoia is nothing a mentally healthy person would do. I would definitely blame a woman who really thinks like that. It’s not just crazy but also insulting on a personal level. But the good thing is that I don’t have to be near any like that either.



  • Nothing do I ever have in common with the cause of the class enemy - Bertolt Brecht

    Liberals and the democratic party are class enemies. Mao and Lenin very well did see the threat of the liberals and their treachery. Lenin quite literally lived through those times when in Germany liberals used proto-fascists to murder socialists and suppress the revolution there.

    Liberals can organize all they want. They’ll still fail and hand power to fascists eventually. Let the American scum suffer their fate.

    They will always be our enemies. The only way any kind of temporary united front will work is if liberals accept to work beneath us, not the other way around. If democrats were willing to follow a communist party for an united front, then it would be acceptable for the time being. But we should never let liberals lead any such endeavour. Because this strengthens them as well. And when all is well and done we need to exterminate liberals along with any fascists and other reactionaries. No united front has ever lead to socialism.

    We’re far better off organising on our own. Our own mass parties need to lead to the establishment of vanguard parties. Or do you really think liberals will allow a Marxist vanguard to take the lead of any uprising or on the political stage at large?





  • That is way more than just patriarchal society. If a woman would rather be stuck in a room with a bear than a man she doesn’t know, there’s something psychologically wrong with that woman.

    The only way you’d choose a bear over a stranger is if you have a prejudice that all men are violent or rapists. Because the bear will most likely kill you.