His genitals got bitten off by a donkey, if I recall correctly. Big donkey is pressuring social media to not platform him. But Elon Musk is standing up to the donkey industrial complex, because his genitals were bitten off by a donkey, too.
They don’t make excuses for power, though.
I gave my sister food poisoning.
Suggestion, try the perfect society again, but ritualistically torture a child to death once a year. Obviously, the ritual would be a sham, with the child being actually an agent, but we’ll make the humans think that it’s real.
So, the typical centrist/liberal, then?
Good for the guy being chased, though. They can focus on avoiding the hitches, while the pursuer has to focus on the target.
The game is a grand strategy game set in space, and it let’s you do some horrific stuff. It let’s you set the rights of every species in your empire, and one of the options is “undesirables”, which means they are going to be the victims of genocide. The game even let’s you pick what method of genocide you prefer. There’s extermination, where they are hunted down by extermination squads and presumably shot on the spot. Then there’s forced labor, where they are worked to death. You can also turn them into food, energy if you’re a machine intelligence, or paperclips, if you’re that kind of machine intelligence. If you prefer a softer approach, you can forcibly sterilize them, so that they die out. Alternatively, you can displace them.
Problem with Starlink is that the satellites need to be replaced every 5 years or so.
What does “Direct and immediate action” entail?
So, what strategy do you think would improve things? What should be done?
Simple. The AI will build something that makes you immortal.
Yeah, but my point was that our current economic system can’t deal with, not that we can’t deal with it in general. Migrating away from the current system would require the powerful to give up their power, which they won’t do willingly, even as the walls are closing in. (In fact, when it comes to global warming, the walls are closing in).
So, why are declining birth rates not a problem?
It’s not shrinking yet, the birth rate is declining, and the world population is projected to start declining 2050.
My theory is that it’s paranoia born out of how the media handles crime, and how isolating suburbia is.
I think I first saw this a decade ago.
Edit: And in that decade, not even a single post about those toilets being installed anywhere. Not one peep.
Maybe. Could also be that humans never invent anything that comes close to a biological brain. Either because we simply aren’t smart enough, or because civilization regresses before we get there. And there’s several trends going on currently which could cause civilization to regress. For example, climate change and declining birth rates (While we could set up an economic system that can deal with a shrinking and aging population, our current one cannot).
I said “scaling” not “scale”. “Scaling” refers to how output and expenses of the enterprise behaves as it becomes bigger or smaller. Threeduck seems to think it means “big”. And then immediately refers the holocaust for some reason.
Though, the term is broad, hence why I asked them about how they interpret the term.
Well, you’d need to shut down the cooling system.