The positive side effects are usually just the effects.

Like I said, I’m not exactly the most informed. I can just about handle supply and demand.

I would argue that women ruined the economy by way of suddenly doubling the available workforce. That sort of thing has got to cause issues.

On the other hand, my education on the subject consists of one class that I’m pretty sure I failed.

Further, the alternative is for women to be unable to make their own way, and that is not acceptable.

Lies.

Trump lies about ICE shooting a woman.

Oh they will. The liberals must pay for what Trump did.

Quite a few, starting with, “how is that relevant?”

Just because someone is the moral equivalent of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch does not inherently mean that they are also the intellectual equivalent of the same.

“Feature Phone” suggests that this was from the late 1900s, or early 2000. Storage limits at the time were impractical.

Does anyone in Washington understand that a “deal” generally includes giving the other guy something they want, not just demanding things that you want?

Have you seen his competition?

I mean, anyone looking at Win11 is gonna be skeptical about anything Microsoft is putting out.

They might as well. I can’t avoid buying EA games any harder than I already do.

That’s kind of what I mean by “sane leadership.” Leaders that know they are there to serve the people, and that they will be removed if they don’t.

Of course, that requires sane voters, too.

We can do that after we get rid of Trump. If we let Trump do it now, he will turn it into a circus, gain some political cover from it, and we will never know for sure who actually did what.

Once we have sane leadership again, then we can do it properly.

The majority of those problems go away if more people had their basic needs met.

If this was true, there would be no reason not to vote on it all together.

This happened under Biden. (Schumer then, too, I belive) Separated a bill, passed the parts the Republicans wanted, then the Republicans voted against the part the Democrat wanted.

Bend over, here it comes again.

The show clearly makes him out to be a loose cannon, dangerous even to his allies. He caused great factionalism in the rebellion.

And he died, having accomplished very little, because he believed that victory comes from purity of purpose, rather than from working together against the enemy of all.

That might work for people with no families. There was a time in my life where I’d have cheerfully defected in exchange for citizenship and protection.

Today, I’d need that for myself and a few others.

I’m not sure I’d call that “unfortunate.” I’ve said for ages that if we can just get more people to vote, it will be good for the democrats. Work the rise of MAGA, I’ve included that if we can get them to think before they vote, that will be even better.

Where do I sign?