On first glace I thought I’d be looking at the UI of a streaming service. This is so awful

I have a Garmin Fenix 7s. This watch also has torx screws on the back. I wear it day and night for 3-4 years now, even when working in the garden etc. and the screw heads are completely clean. So I don’t think it’s an issue.

If you get the Rambler, it has a flathead on the file and a philips on the combi tool thingy. This is the one I have on my keychain and it’s amazing. Of course it’s definitely not so robust as the 91mm models.

I think that’s a Peugeot 208

Yubikeys. I have 2 of them and both have the same entries in case one breaks.

Relation-chips?

Unfortunately no, the new installation on the phone will not sync any previous chats from a desktop client.

That was indeed my point. Thank you and a pleasant week to you too

Yes, a lot of stuff is political but their AI loving dad being a fascist, or at least a supporter of fascists, is completely irrelevant regarding discussion about the ethical use of image generation. Same goes for the claim the left is done. It’s only and attempted ragebait and adds nothing. You can see it in so many places in the comments under various posts, which is annoying at times.

Oh yes please bring politics into everything! It makes discussions so much enjoyable! Please tell me more about your political views and those of your family, it adds so much to this post!

I never tried to win any argument. Hell I was not even aware that I’m participating in one. I just wanted to share the info, that even if the vendor is absolutely trustworthy and even if you validated the script by downloading and looking at it, there’s still another hole that’s not obvious to see.

Yes it’s unlikely, but again, I never said it were. There are also arguments you can run curl with, to tell it to do the download first and then push it through the pipe afterwards, though I don’t know them by heart now.

It won’t cost you anything to set those parameters, when you insist to use curl | bash, just in the off chance that someone’s trying to do what I mentioned.

But I’m also someone who usually validates their downloads with a checksum so maybe I’m just weird. Who knows.

You shouldn’t install software from someone you don’t trust anyway because even if the installation process is save, the software itself can do whatever it has permission to.

“So if you trust their software, why not their install script?” you might ask. Well, it is detectable on server side, if you download the script or pipe it into a shell. So even if the vendor it trustworthy, there could be a malicious middle man, that gives you the original and harmless script, when you download it, and serves you a malicious one when you pipe it into your shell.

And I think this is not obvious and very scary.