One of the key elements my girlfriend tells me is that I’m the only one to call her on her bullshit.
Guess to each their own.
One of the key elements my girlfriend tells me is that I’m the only one to call her on her bullshit.
Guess to each their own.
For snowboarding and skateboarding I’ve always used the Clip by Sansa, works in any weather, pretty damned tough, and if I lose or break it, at $32 I just dont care.
I watch plenty of game stuff online, but there is no way I’m spoiling a game I’ve waited 20 years to play.
I’ll never get the chance to play an OG Zelda for the first time again.
I have the N64 version, as well as the switch.
Think I’ll probably play it on switch just to have wireless controller.
Majoras Mask. I’ve bought it, but am too wrapped up in factorio, another one I waited far to long to play.
The thing that immediately ruined it for me was the leveled enemies and weapons.
Ok, so I can head shot a guy in this region and he dies, but same enemy one zone over takes like 10 shots.
It’s a lazy way of forcing artificial difficulty and making you follow a certian path through the game.
Did the same shit to the assassins creed series as well.
Nothing wrong with having one sexual partner, and a small but relyable support group consisting of friends and family.
My girlfriend is an amazing woman, but I certianly don’t rely on her for everything. We live together, and she hears about most of my stuff, but there are hobbies and technical things I save for the people who are into those things.
The Beeblebrox paradox
The two that come to mind are Ghost Recon Breakpoint and Farcry 6.
They might have been ok games if the previous ones hadn’t been so damned good.
At least with Breakpoint they tried to make it right with a new mode, but still don’t enjoy it as much as Wildlands.
Leveled enemies and weapons are just not something I’m going to play.
The chances of me personally firebombing anything is functionally 0.
I certianly expect someone else to handle this for me, the men and women of the US military who aren’t going to a US city into fucking Dresden.
My suggestion was to rely on the mechanism which has handled this type of issue without fail since day one.
Yours is to encite random acts of partisan violence.
I’m going stick with my plan thanks.
Well, let’s see.
It won’t be his moral fiber.
It won’t be China or Russia the only two military powers that have a chance to have any influence on CONUS affairs.
Maybe his desperate desire for public approval as I suspect major ordinance dropped on a US population center isn’t going to poll well, but I’d hate to count on that.
Me? Stop the president from doing literally anything? You vastly over estimate my powers.
If your point is that this mechanism won’t work, then I’m assuming your point is that nothing can stop Trump.
Doesn’t mean my answer was wrong or clueless, only that the means to stop him has failed.
If you think something else is stopping him, I’d be very curious what that might be.
The chain of command goes from the secretary of defense all the way down to the most junior enlisted personnel.
You seem to assume I meant the joint chiefs or some small hand full of senior commanders.
Generals don’t pull the trigger, and as someone else pointed out, the logistics involved with bombing a city includes hundreds of service members.
Not sure where you get off calling me clueless as my initial response exactly answers the original question.
If not for honorable service members respecting their oaths and the UCMJ, there is literally nothing stopping Trump from bombing Chicago or LA.
He is commander in chief of the US military.
The US military stresses disobeying illegal orders.
So the simple answer is the US military chain of command respecting their oath to the constitution over loyalty to Trump.
We just need to compromise, arrays start at 0.5
We’ve had plenty of very hot years, including up to a week of 100+ days.
My first thought was “Did they not get data on IL?”.
This year has been cooler, but a lot more storms.
Still plenty of 90+ days this year.