Maybe, but like you say, is this an absurd parody of an insane rightwing nutjob, or just an insane rightwing nutjob? So hard to tell, and these days I find Onion headlines about what the GOP says completely plausible, no longer reacting “surely not?!” but instead “of course they do.”

In any case this is an attitude from yesteryear that should have stayed there and needs calling out.

If it was sarcasm, I’m agreeing with the intent of its author and if it wasn’t, I’m gleefully disagreeing.

Congrats on misinterpreting other sexualities as character flaws.

If you had to decide not to find people of the same gender sexually attractive, you’re not as straight as you like to think.

I think the person who you’re replying to wasn’t laughing at people with addiction problems at all, rather they were pouring scorn and skepticism on the idea that some wonder drug can fix all the problems of people who end up with drug addictions.

Let’s take homeless people for example (who are frequently people who were in the care system as children, so don’t have parents or relatives to go back and live with when money gets too tight).

All the things that I do to cope with my (much less serious) problems, like chill on the sofa on my phone, take a long bath, go for a nap on my bed, hang out with my friends at the pub, talk it all over with my wife or my dad, none of those are open to them. Sleeping rough is painful. How do you escape that?

So to expand on what @gibmiser@lemmy.world said, if you treat the drug addiction of a homeless person on its own, you will completely and utterly fail to treat the drug addiction problem.

LLMs are winging it through every conversation they ever have.

Conservatives lack reasonable bullshit spotting skills.

LLMs often start by telling you that you are right, irrespective of the facts.

Conservatives don’t Lille having their worldview challenged by facts.

Of course conservatives would happily swallow ai slop.

Thank you. Yours is great too. Have a fantastic week.

git commit - m “put today’s ‘genius’ far right nonsense in the prompt to counteract any bias towards factual accuracy that was previously there”

Interesting. Yes.

If you feel this as a loss, I’m sure that if you let this be known widely enough in your friend group, someone will offer to help you out with the missing sensory data.

And if not, there’s definitely an app for that. Just put that on your profile.

You test them? Your parties must be unsettling for new friends!

Pubic lice.

Eeeeeeee brbrbrbbrbrll gzzzd
Ding-ur-ding-ur-ding brrp
cshshshshshshshshshshshshshshshshshshshshsh…

Actually I quite liked that bit. It was reassuring and familiar and you knew it was working.

What I didn’t like was taking 20 minutes to download a tiny video, anyone picking up the phone instantly killing your connection including the software download you’d been watching download for the last 15 minutes and the cost per minute and unreliability that taught me to connect, download my email, open my messages page, on the forum, disconnect, write all the forum replies in notepad and email replies in my client, then dial up again, hit sync on the email client and paste all my replies back in the forum.

Conservatives sure like to stick up for the worst polluters. You could just tax the fuel like any other industry.

“Oooo, pain is so close to pleasure”
but also “Fat bottomed girls, you make the rocking world go round.”

No tax on airline fuel.

Well, it wasn’t in r/NoStupidAnswers, I suppose.

I do not miss dial up.

Just pop in a magnetic screwdriver bit holder and you have strong power and perfect control.

It countersinks with ease but without the risk of screwing too deep like its electric counterpart all too easily does.

Foreplay.

No, she’s just trying to flirt with one of you.

Thank you for my favourite giggle of the day.

That makes even less sense to me than what you wrote before!