This is great, but it would never work with any of the dogs I’ve ever had.
I’ve always been very thorough with the way I train animals, to the point that they do not eat until given the command “Good Job, go ahead.” They would even wait patiently with treats on their nose.
If a dog doesn’t understand you are in control over when and what it eats, a dog will not listen to you in pretty much any circumstance. It’s the foundation for well trained animals.
Global Warming is NOT independent of population.
The population growth almost perfectly aligns with climate change, and the top polluters on the planet are China despite having one of the lowest pollution per capita ratios.
More humans = more environmental destruction
They don’t NEED more people, nowhere on earth NEEDS more people, as long as you have as few as 12 genetically distinct individuals then life will continue, and even if they did NEED people then theres lots of people all over the world who would love to migrate to SK.
Thank goodness, my John Deere side hustle was slowing down.
I wonder how this is going to effect stock prices. On one hand it’s bad, but on the other hand shareholders might not care that it’s bad.
You might notice I never once promoted any such depopulation ideas, simply that the natural negative growth trend as a result of highly educated populations is a good thing that we should not take any action against.
We need less people, we don’t need to make the number of people less: it happens on its own.
If it were possible to make a nondiscrimatory policy against growth then that would be great, but we already saw attempts fail in places like China which resulted in skewed demographics. In 1994 in Cairo the UN met and decided the best answer was simply: Educate Women.
Idgaf about replacement rate. I don’t want the old to be replaced. I want the economy to get smaller and for the wealth to be better distributed.
Technically there should be a ratio of young to old to take care of all of the elderly, but IMO fuck’em it wasn’t the young’s choice to be born and suffer for the sake of the old.
Lower population will make resource allocation easier and improve quality of life, and obviously is necessary to prevent further environmental damage. There will be momentary suffering for a brighter future.
Might be bad now but it leads to a better future. Infinite growth was always impossible, this is just the result of decades of mismanagement.
Ah yes, those people. The ones we all know. “The establishment.”
Polls are showing him above every other candidate combined.
Lmfao, Tankies talking about nationalism and the conditions that give rise to authoritarianism. What a fucking joke.
Lmao no we’re not, that’s why he’s on our ticket. Zohran’s our guy.
A vast majority of Democrats support Mamdani, in legislative chambers state and federal and especially in polls. That’s why Zohran Mamdani IS A DEMOCRAT.
Personally I think a much bigger issue is that no rights are being protected and we’re devolving into a white nationalist militaristic dictatorship which refuses to tax the rich.
But keep wingeing about the horrors of copyright laws and small scale landlords.
Corporate needs you to identify the difference between these two pictures.
Somebody needs to tweak these bots they all fall back on variations of this one phrase once they lose the argument.
And yet somehow none of this happened under the DNC? You make zero sense.
Actually, aggregate polls predicted the second Trump victory. I was really stressing about it before the election.