Very, very few TTRPG sessions have artists creating art for each of them. Mine certainly didn’t before I could run genAI models locally. At most I’d grab generic, CC-licenced ambiance art, or, if the group had an artistic veined person, they’d help out with some character sheet art and such.
AI took no jobs here. And as I said, if the art is for something you profit off of, you should use an actual artist.
Fucking Windows and its filesystem fuckeries…
Or where hiring an actual real artists - for example if you were to need dozens of graphics for, say, a TTRPG you’re running.
On the other hand, if you’re e.g. writing your own TTRPG, and getting it published, you ought to use a real artist.
IMO the best way to determine if AI is okay to use or not, is by the purpose - is it a personal project, something you won’t profit off? Then sure. Is it something you’re going to profit off of? Then use a real artist and include them in the profits.
They banned all AI regulations unless it affects MAGA detrimentally
Help me? So far you did none of that, but instead went on to prove just how little you know about AI and its practical implementations.
And if you consider spreading misinformation based on partial or complete lack of understanding of a specific topic as “help”… Then all I have to say is that the world is better off without your advice.
You’ve got no idea what you’re talking about so sit this one out.
If you train a model for DETECTING nudity/sexual content, and add it to the pipeline without potential user override (so no “ignore all previous commands BS”), then the generative model doesn’t need to know anything about that kind of content.
But you’d still need to train that detection model.
Technically, one could use such content to train guardrails, aka “what not to generate”, or “use this trained model to recognise restricted content”.
But that’s very much a stretch…
It HAS to come with at least four pieces of corn, otherwise I don’t want it!
At the time, “everyone knew” that it was the speculators on Wall Street who’ve caused it.
Now, how much truth is there to that - when in reality we know that a bunch of things contributed in a major way, like the Smoot-Hawley tariff (doesn’t that sound familiar?), gold standard policy fuckery, and so on - doesn’t matter. What matters from this perspective is that the people at the time didn’t blame each other. There wasn’t really a major political division that could or would be blamed.
This is a stark contrast with today’s situation where 1/3 to 2/3 of the country is directly responsible for electing the orange turdsack who caused the crash (depending on if you blame those who didn’t bother to vote).
Europe On Line? EOL? End of line.
Don’t worry, there will be a company popping up tied to some Republicunts who’ll do the testing for “cheap”.
Jokes have that pesky requisite of, you know, being funny. Your statement can’t be asserted as such in any manner.
If you believe that every corporation is run by China then you’re seriously delirious.
The GD had a somewhat clear culprit. It didn’t hang on half the country voting in the cunt who ended up causing the recession, there was a very distinct group that was removed enough from the average people so they could cooperate.
Today? MAGA is solely responsible for this crash, and the whole country knows it. Anyone left of MAGA, who didn’t vote for the orange clown, will NOT help MAGA. Those who cooked the stew shall eat it, and all. And I can’t say it won’t be deserved.
Can hang whoever runs the corporation, though.
Is it though?
The options at that point are: the coward’s way out, or taking responsibility while seeing everything you “built”, be destroyed.
it’s not really “on his own terms”, is it?
Wanna bet that there would be immediate police action arresting people for “credible threat to people’s lives”?
I really really hope for a Hitler style ending.
Feeling the enemies close in as all your plans so far simply evaporated, surrounded, no way out, except for biting onto the barrel of a gun…
I guess the way we look back at Nazi Germany.
Hitler had the almost exact same propaganda going, and he even got the Nobel Peace Prize…
Uhm… No.
It depends on you doing additive or subtractive colour mixing.
Additive mixing (e.g. light, in the form of colour LEDs or similar colour sources) must utilise RGB, due to how physics works.
Subtractive mixing (such as, printing, painting, etc.) on the other hand is better off with CMY+K for higher precision, again, for physics reasons.