Oh haha, Gee whiz neighbor, I wish I could say different but I’m quite certain I would eat the lips clean off your head if I had to.

That’s not to say I would never consider doing that with some friends though.

Its possible, like I said the signature may be behind that grass - but it is just too bad it is not credited regardless. If you were the photographer, you would think you would look for the signature/source of the art you are photographing to credit it.

Fascinating. I think this may be a photoshopped image though. That fox art was made by an artist named “stewy”, but I have not seen a picture of it on this short wall.

https://i.pinimg.com/1200x/05/c1/9e/05c19ea496215b9d707767dbce172241.jpg

How do I know this? Because I adapted my own profile picture here from the original source years ago, long before 2018.

It’s sad to see that Matthew here does not seem to be crediting the original creator of the art in their article. I expect if this is real, the artists signature should be right there behind that grass, or was otherwise removed.

One of my favorite comparisons is computing to magic. They say that sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

A lot of people have a hard time drawing that comparison, but if you tell them that there are very special, rare silica rocks that you can only find in specific places on earth, and that if you inscribe one of these rocks with billions of tiny transistors runes and then power infuse the rock with electricity lightning you can actually make trick the rock into a processor thinking, and that this now let’s you create software incantations which explain to the processor thinking rock how to execute a program do specific things for you, then they begin to see why.

Well that’s not too bad honestly, so long as you know where you are to begin with. Thanks for testing!

Interesting, I haven’t heard of this. Thank you!

I’ll take a look, thank you!

I have not, but I saw someone recommending something similar as well, I’ll have to read up. Thanks!

Nice to see they took it under consideration for the future though! Thanks!

Interesting nonetheless, thanks!

Yes, I have edited my post to reflect that.

I would not be able to use the browser for use cases in which I am in the woods, wanting to look at the maps for the purpose of mapping out trails etc. It would also be handy for typical internet outage situations etc.