lovingisliving

sigh

Because it shows the idiocy of those who blindly and vehemently opposed AI, and proves that their bias is not based in any sort of reality.

I have seen them not posted by bots, as I have posted them on a Lemmy burner account. So this is somewhat personal for me.

The problem is that there is a current developing dogma around AI that, because the last example you gave exists, then it must be opposed in all cases. There is a lack of nuance. That is why there may be some “pro-ai” posts, to point out this nuance. The only reason they exist is due to the bias against it as a whole.

A gold plated statue is really on the nose for this con artist.

The only drama I am aware of recently was a piefed admin blocking some smaller anarchist instances, but it stirred up a shit storm and they reversed it. Not sure if that is the drama in question.

Who could have seen this coming?? Oh wait, anyone with a brain.

What part of what I said implies that I want bots to take the place of humans on social networks? What a very strange conclusion to jump to. I just think that AI has some useful applications.

People have different opinions on AI, not everyone is vehemently opposed, and some view it as useful if used on the appropriate configuration.

deleted by creator

We really need an alternative to Lemmy and piefed for the threadiverse. I say this as a leftist. People are not children who need child locks put on their internet. This is not the type of environment I joined the fediverse to be a part of, that censors links just because the server admin disagrees with the politics.

Yes, right after working families goes bankrupt because they can’t afford to go to their job.

They remade Riven, and it got a sequel, Obduction.

I heard this spoken in his voice from south park, like the “it’s a plane” dude.

When did I say anything about it being rapid or sudden change? Climate change is slow, and the effects are felt over decades. I am fully aware of this, and just because the effects are akin to boiling a frog, it does not mean that the ultimate effects will not be devastating.

I’m not a procrastinator, I’m just a temporarily embarrassed polymath.

Did you also call that the water would have a grapefruit flavoring option? Lmao.

If we keep burning oil fields and melting the Arctic which releases massive methane emissions, then we could be pretty fucked. Maybe not all non-microbial life, but we could be headed toward lizard world again.

That’s a pretty over simplistic analogy. We didn’t build the ecosystem, and we are not going to be rebuilding anything if it collapses. Whatever is left will survive and adapt, and maybe some species smarter than us will evolve in a few hundred million years that will actually learn how to properly live in their environment without destroying it. Or if some humans do survive, they will be able to rebuild society based on an understanding of ecological limits.

Yes, some have taken steps to move away from fossil fuels, but not all, and most scientists agree it is too late without negative emissions. I agree that it is largely driven by capitalism, and that in and of itself is a root cause of many problems with our species and should be done away with, but if it takes the entire world falling apart to make the realities undeniably apparent, then so be it. I’m not saying I want it to happen, just that that may be the only thing that can make the conditions for real lasting change.