Kamala Harris tried to please everyone. She tried to please those who supported Israel by saying Israel has the right to defend itself. She tried to please those who wanted Israel to stop bombing in Gaza by saying Israel should be more careful with its bombing. Trump clearly stated he supported Israel and got the support of those who favored Israel. Those who didn’t support Israel chose not to support Harris because she didn’t commit to opposing Israel’s actions in Gaza. Harris disregarded one of Aesop’s Fables. See https://discover.hubpages.com/literature/The-man-the-boy-and-the-donkey-Aesops-fables-retold

This might cause Iranians to support their government despite disliking it and Iranians in the US who supported Trump’s attack on Iran might now have second thoughts.

Conversion therapy is not going to work because the cause of sexual orientation is probably biological. From https://scienceinsights.org/is-being-gay-genetic-what-science-actually-says/

Sexual orientation is a complex trait resulting from an intricate interplay of influences, not a single cause. Current scientific consensus points to a combination of genetic, hormonal, and developmental factors interacting during an individual’s formation. It is likely shaped by multiple biological predispositions that manifest during development.

I don’t think North Korea’s economy is doing well but the important point is that many countries which are ethnically homogeneous do well such as Russia, China, Japan, and even South Korea.

I don’t think his method is correct. States must already know where people live otherwise, how can they gerrymander? A possible computer program would have a cursor start from the top left of a state and move right. The cursor’s vertical distance would be preset. Once it counts a specific number of people, it would draw a district and continue. When it reaches the right border of a state it would go down and move right. Have companies bid on a redistricting program to see if it’s achievable.

Mixing but only to a certain extent. Animals including humans are naturally altruistic toward their relatives. The biological purpose is to promote their genes. That’s the reason Scots form clans. Some ethnic mixing is good because different ethnic groups have genes that other groups might not have but this should not reach a point where an ethnic group’s identity is wiped out because of mixing. Think of the Olympic flag which has 5 rings The rings overlap but only partially. North Korea is poor not because of ethnonationalism but poor government. China, Japan, and Russia are examples of homogeneous societies which are doing well.

Decades ago, Trump’s extreme policies regarding border security would never have been necessary because there would never have been a flood of illegal migrants. In the 1960s, the Civil Rights movement began. Even nonwhite US citizens faced discrimination.

No, politics too far to the left produces far-right parties. One of Trump’s top campaign issues was tougher border security. The AfD party is becoming popular because of its anti-immigration stance. It has been stopped by Merz’s centrist views.

Why is a terrible idea?

No, I was concerned because I thought it would be foolish for Democrats to risk being blamed for the long lines at airports. It appears I was correct because the Senate did end the partial shutdown without curbs on ICE.

Removed by mod

You continually refuse to explain how you would make my example computer program partisan. My hamburger making analogy shows that it’s not possible to alter the software program for other reasons. The head of the company making the program might be sexual promiscuous but that won’t affect the program.

The Senate just ended the partial shutdown without curbs on ICE. It appears Senate Democrats agree with me that they might get the blame for the long lines at airports.

You haven’t explained how a company’s ethic and business strategy would affect the program I mentioned. Suppose this company had to design a program for a robot which made hamburgers. How would this company’s ethic and business strategy affect this.

Where did I say I didn’t say that? I could be incorrect. The important thing is who the American public will blame for the long lines., Democrats or Republicans. I think it would be smart for Democrats to not take the chance of being blamed and let Americans see the misbehavior of ICE, so Republicans get the blame.

I believe I did read that, but Democrats have to let the public know this, so they don’t get the blame. Some news outlets say that Democrats want to first reform ICE.

How do I know that you read my replies to others? How would corruption affect the program I mentioned?

What do you expect me to do? Rewrite the same response for every reply. How do I know that you read my replies to others?

I believe so but Ukraine will need help if Trump betrays Ukraine. That’s the reason for my proposal.

Then how would people vote for their representatives?

It’s who gets the blame. Democrats don’t want to get the blame for the long lines at airports. Let Republicans get the blame for the actions of ICE.

According to the news, Democrats want reforms at ICE before they will fund TSA. If you are correct, Democrats has to make clear that they are willing to fund all agencies except ICE now and address reforms at ICE later. It’s the blame game. Democrats have to make sure they don’t get the blame.