Semperverus

Who wants to buy Trump and put him to work cleaning gutter drains with his teeth?

Its the pawussy!

Another fail on your part. Try again.

People who tell other people they’re not men deserve the Hague.

YOU are the problem.

Ridiculous, funny, and practical. My favorite combo.

You mean an actual dad being an actual dad and buying things that make him happy and encourage him to use them more?

Remind me how you aren’t the baby here?

I just wanna say, you are a cool person and don’t let the chuds here saying mean things about people who like this stuff get to you. They’re the insecure and fragile ones who can’t tolerate a tactical style bag making someone happy. Let the men have their fun, assholes!

There’s the door, see yourself out.

Bluey gang rise up

Bro its a funny meme diaper bag that makes memelords happy

What if he has these accessories because they make him happy? Would you be a judgemental shit-bag to him about it or just think cool dad for actively caring about his kid?

That’s cool as hell lol, I wish I had these when I needed them.

The meme potential alone would have me rocking them all day.

NGL as a dad myself, I would be far more likely to make fun of this guy and his tacticool diaper bag than any dad carrying around the girliest bag their wife obviously picked out.

And people are calling the guy in the OP image fragile…

They support web browsers

It does work well but that’s not what OP asked for, they asked for wireless VR.

I believe if you’re willing to compromise and install chrome/chromium 🤢 you can run ALVR? It requires a Quest headset last I checked though.

I wish we would all start switching over to JSON for configuration files. It’s so much easier to parse, and you can’t screw it up with too many spaces or not enough.

My argument is incredibly simple:

YOU exist. In this universe. Your brain exists. The mechanisms for sentience exist. They are extremely complicated, and complex. Magic and mystic Unknowables do not exist. Therefore, at some point in time, it is a physical possibility for a person (or team of people) to replicate these exact mechanisms.

We currently do not understand enough about them yet to do this. YOU are so laser-focused on how a Large Language Model behaves that you cannot take a step back and look at the bigger picture. Stop thinking about LLMs specifically. Neural-network artificial intelligence comes in many forms. Many are domain-specific such as molecular analysis for scientific research. The AI of tomorrow will likely behave very different from those of today, and may require hardware breakthroughs to accomplish (I don’t know that x86_64 or ARM instruction sets are sufficient or efficient enough for this process). But regardless of how it happens, you need to understand that because YOU exist, you are the prime reason it is not impossible or even unfeasible to accomplish.

This argument feels extremely hand-wavey and falls prey to the classic problem of “we only know about X and Y that exist today, therefore nothing on this topic will ever change!”

You also limit yourself when sticking strictly to narrow thought experiments like the Chinese room.

If you consider the human brain, which is made up of nigh-innumerable smaller domain-specific neural nets combined together with the frontal lobe, has consciousness, this absolutely means that it is physically possible to replicate this process by other means.

We noticed how birds fly and made airplanes. It took many, MANY Iterations that seem excessively flawed by today’s standards, but were stepping stones to achieve a world-changing new technology.

LLMs today are like DaVinci’s corkscrew flight machine. They’re clunky, they technically perform something resembling the end goal but ultimately in the end fail the task they were built for in part or in whole.

But then the Wright brothers happened.

Whether sentient AI will be a good thing or not is something we will have to wait and see. I strongly suspect it won’t be.

EDIT: A few other points I wanted to dive into (will add more as they come to mind):

AI derangement or psychosis is a term meant to refer to people forming incredibly unhealthy relationships with AI to the point where they stop seeing its shortcomings, but I am noticing more and more that people are starting to throw it around like the “Trump Derangement Syndrome” term, and that’s not okay.

I think this post requires a certain level of schizo-posting culture (shitposting) to understand.

The character being portrayed by the young woman here seems to be an engineer of some sort who is fascinated with ocean-compatible robotics. She is implying that her research is going to be highly invaluable for when the earth eventually floods from polar icecap melting, heat expansion, etc. after the world “ends.” Her robots would help with hunting/gathering tasks with the world underwater.

The “husbando” bit is a casual racism/“Engrish” way of implying that she is married to (or at least very into) you, the reader. You are her partner, or she at least thinks you are (could be one of those “they don’t know they’re my boyfriend yet” scenarios, unclear and needs more detail).