Tad Lispy

Proton is not a social medium. As to “how high”, the lawmakers have to decide on that, hopefully after some research and public consultations. It’s not an unprecedented problem.

Another criterion might be revenue. If a company monetises users attention and makes above certain amount, put extra moderation requirements on them.

I imagine ability to fork, comment, open an issue or a merge (pull) request, do a code review etc from an account on one instance to a project on another. That would enable true decentralisation of software development. It was one of the original promises of Git, but was lost with the emergence of GitHub. With such federated network of forges each developer, or a group working on a project, could run their own server and collaborate with anyone else, without registering accounts on hundreds of services. I’d love that.

The project is very interesting. After quickly browsing their website I understand that it’s a kind of a framework to build fediverse apps. It’s implemented in Elixir programming language and uses Postgres as a database. Looks like they are putting a lot is emphasis on community and cooperative aspects.

Fixed. Thanks!

Thanks for the warning. Here’s the link to the original study, so we don’t have to drive traffic to that guys website.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08872

I haven’t got time to read it and now I wonder if it was represented accurately in the article.

Anyway, I’m in some kinda weird half-and-half place.

Like everyone else then.

We used to call them type A and type B personalities,

Who’s “we”? A quick glance at Wikipedia gives me the impression that it’s the American tobacco industry and “scientists” on their payroll. Hopefully you are not one of them.