You are incorrect.

It won’t happen overnight.

If homeless people would prefer living in tents under highways, that’s their choice.

They create the economic activity.

More people living in an area means there’s more to do and more people to do it.

On average, each additional person contributes more than they take out.

More people living in a location means there is more work to be done and more people to do it.

Each additional person, on average, can contribute more than they take out.

Keep being smart.

Such as?

The people who move there will create jobs and demand.

You are smart.

if I was as wealthy as some of the celebrities you smart people keep sucking off, I would definitely be funneling my wealth to those who need it.

Stupid people keep supporting their oppressors and getting mad at anyone who calls it out.

You are smart.

Even if 92% of vacant homes are as you describe, the remaining 8% would be enough to house every homeless person.

Sounds like all those places need are people to live in them.

It’s a win-win.

Yep. The ‘housing crisis’ is a load of bullshit.

So we can have people with excessive wealth like paul?

Hard pass.

Yeah, and they still make music.

How much do they need, though?

You people never factor this in. It’s always an on-off switch in your minds.

deleted by creator

sky bloom effects, new ambient occlusion, and lighting updates

They made it blurrier to waste processing power and claim it looks better.

Keep in mind, these businessmen only hate AI because it threatens their money.