Debanking on wikipedia

So with the new regime executive order declaring it essentially illegal to be unhoused, people at risk might be thinking, “how do they classify me as homeless if I am surfing between friends or family or shelters?”

One of the big answers to this is the practice of debanking. If your financial institutions catch wind that you don’t have a stable address, they will try to close your accounts and send your balance as a cashier’s check to your last legal address. At-risk people understand the many, many scenarios where even just this process could be devastating.

Some unexpected ways you can get de-banked:

  • your apartment doesn’t have a legal address

  • you lose home owner’s insurance or your coverage changes and your bank decides it doesn’t like that

  • your building’s owner defaults

  • fire

  • flood

You may be at risk and just now realizing it. If you have an MH diagnosis and you don’t have two back-up legal addresses, you are on this Ex O.

Anyway, do not get debanked. Have legal address back-up plans EVEN IF YOU TRY TO FLEE THE COUNTRY because you do not want the regime classifying you as someone they want to put in the camps.

Sorry for another US-centric post.

    • Ptsf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      To be honest, this shift in our politics has been brutally quick and more federally far reaching than anything that happened while I was growing up. People used to be able to just exist. Camp in parks, sleep on benches, etc. This authoritarianism is… Somewhat new.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean tresspass laws designed to prevent newly freed black people from “just existing” go back to 1865.

        • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, I was going to say something similar. The “it’s now illegal to [x] while black” memes are because the BIPOC community has known this for a long time now. Standing while black, walking while black, jogging while black, eating while black, listening to music while black, sleeping while black, etc… All of these are things that people have been attacked by cops for doing, for literal generations.

          It’s not new; it’s just more visible. And it has finally become so overt that non-BIPOC people have started to feel the same pressure that BIPOC people have dealt with since the country was founded.

            • nomy@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              29 days ago

              The second biggest was letting a bunch of traitors go home with their heads held high to establish a mythos about some imagined noble heritage. Officers should’ve been hanged/shot, lands should’ve been confiscated and given to newly freed peoples, “40 acres and a mule.”

      • 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It started in earnest under Regan. It’s just been difficult to see where all those changes would lead until all at once it smacked us in the face.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s only been quick if you just started paying attention. This is the end result of decades of work by the GOP.

  • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    For all other Europeans out there, avoiding this situation is another thing the EU did for us.

    For the Americans, write to your representatives demanding the same rights.

    Excluding people from having a bank account in 2025 is basically condemning them to ostracism even without sending them to concentration camps.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve long held the belief that the US postal service should also provide basic banking services too in the US, that way no one can be denied a bank account.

      • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        One of the things Bernie Sanders ran on. He wanted to do that and ton more good things for us little people. But the Democrats rather have fascism under Trump then progressive policies.

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I didn’t know that existed!

          Its decline reads like everything else going on in the US. Government provided a service a lot of people liked, private enterprise lobbies to have it shut down and lock people into nickel and diming them.

          • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            30 days ago

            In terms of private banks, a basic savings account wouldn’t really be a big risk for them nowadays because it’s a bare bones account. It doesn’t include things like access to credit cards or other forms of credits, or any form of long term investments.

            If anything, banks might even like the idea, because it gives them a way to offload their riskier (and let’s be honest less profitable) customers without making society fully collapse.

            If the system is implemented properly it’s a win-win for everyone.

            • jacksilver@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              30 days ago

              I wish that was the case, but there are a lot of people that see government provided services as waste/fraud. I mean look at how the federal government is being eviscerated right now.

              It would be nice if everyone could be guaranteed a safe place to manage money though.

  • zingo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I came into this thread thinking that the term de-banking was something like de-google and I was eager to find some opensource service tô get rid of the dependency of banks all together.

    Boy was I wrong. /s

    Good advice though!

    • omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I was eager to find some opensource service tô get rid of the dependency of banks all together.

      Credit unions

      • ordinarylove@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Indeed, part of protecting yourself is diversifying where you keep your money (even if you don’t have a lot), and part of that answer is credit unions. Don’t just assume in institution is okay just because they are a CU though, plenty of scum CUs.