I suspect that this is the direct result of AI generated content just overwhelming any real content.

I tried ddg, google, bing, quant, and none of them really help me find information I want these days.

Perplexity seems to work but I don’t like the idea of AI giving me “facts” since they are mostly based on other AI posts

ETA: someone suggested SearXNG and after using it a bit it seems to be much better compared to ddg and the rest.

  • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The whole internet is in the process of being filled with garbage content. Search engines are bad but also there’s not much good content left to find (in % of the total)

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    You know what I miss? Search engines that honored Boolean operators. I am often looking for niche results and being able to -, ! and NOT is incredibly useful. But that’s just not a thing anymore. I know part of it is that SEO includes antonym meta data that ruins this but it would still be helpful on occasion.

  • anttifantti@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I feel like it’s especially bad if you are searching for anything related to a marketable product. I tried searching ddg for information about using a surge protector with halogen bulbs and all I got was pages and pages of listicles on “best halogen lights 2024” full of affiliate links.

  • zante@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Not just you.

    DDG has deteriorated to absolute nonsense, I’ve used it for years and years.

    Recently gave startpage another go - maybe marginally better but still really poor

    • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I switched to DDG right after Google added the ai answers to search and in baffled by how fast DDG seemed to go down hill. Just a few months ago it was still giving me on point results on the first try, now it almost feels like I’m using one of those malware search bars from back in the day.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s not just you. Search got worse, and it did so intentionally.

    Ed Zitron lays it all out really well, with all the receipts, but the basic version is this; Google has an incentive to make you search more for the same things, because then they can show you more ads. And google is, first and foremost, an ad delivery company. Every “product” they own is an ad delivery vehicle. It’s not just AI slop that made search based; Google made search bad, and everyone else followed suit, to a greater or lesser degree.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        is it? that kind of makes sense, because I still use Bing occasionally while Google is completely out of rotation, although I don’t find Bing as good as duckduckgo.

        edit: it is not! looks like the DuckDuckGo search engine is an aggregate of hundreds of search engines, including their own duck duck bot, excluding Google but including some Bing results.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      DDG often gives me results for individual words of the search but not results for all of the words in that order for which to have contextually relevant results.

      I often find myself forced to brave the shitshow that is google search.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        have you tried the duck assist thing yet?

        If you’re trying to talk to the search engine more like a chat assistant, that sort of response might be what you’re looking for.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Fuck Duck Assist all my homies hate Duck Assist and I keep having to turn it back off again.

          Whoever made it should get cancer and not have their children show up or call them back.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            haha, whaaat why?

            I just saw it for the first time today, it seems to mostly quote incredible sources rather than amalgamating responses.

            you got some issues huh, poor fella?

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’m sorry I hurt your feelings and made you want to defend an LLM that approves copy pasted wikipedia snippets, but maybe you should go eat some ass?

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                “I’m sorry I hurt your feelings”

                I feel only pity for you.

                reading your comments is like watching a diseased guinea pig nibble on its own scabs.

                “an LLM that approves copy pasted wikipedia snippets”

                duckduckgo’s llm tool offers relevant information from credible sources.

                that is good.

                Good luck unbunching those panties.

  • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    they overengineered it. they now give you results they think most people want instead of what you searched. for google, it helps to switch on verbatim mode and set your country to something weird like Azerbaijan

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    It is, and it’s not just the search engines to blame.

    The content out there is incredibly spammy. It doesn’t pay to create good content. It pays to make a pool of AI gunge based on what people search for and then stick ads on it.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Spam sites laden with key words and massive SEO to farm advertising dollars from clicks long predated AI

      It doesnt help that big search engines like google have realized people will go as far as page 2 or 3 to find the results, so intentionally worsen their search results to increase ads being served.

  • Hannes@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m very happy with kagi at the moment. Just crossed one year using it as my main search engine last week and don’t see why I would go back.

    • MTK@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Having to signup and login to a search engines sounds like an annoying hassle

      • uzay@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It is. And it’s also terrible for privacy, but people do it with google as well.

      • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Signing up and logging in isn’t a problem imo. I wouldn’t even mind if I had to pay for searches, but I’m not going to make it a subscription service. Unless they add an option to do something like buy 1000 searches that never expire, its not something I’d considered. I do think they beat out competitors like google with their results pretty consistently though based on the trial.

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m not gonna subscription my heated car seats but search is a service that costs an ongoing amount to provide. The subscription isn’t significant, it’s $5 a month for 300 searches (or $10 for unlimited).

          I know we’ve been conditioned to expect search for free, but if we want to get away from the “the user is the product” model then I think it’s a good thing to have a subscription to a service that has ongoing costs to provide.

    • Nite@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Same. Using Kagi feels like surfing the old web. The first thing I did was block all Pinterest results. That alone made every search golden. 😂

      • ownsauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I hate Pinterest lol, best thing about Kagi is being able to block whole sites and it remembers your preferences. I may come back to Kagi but I didn’t feel like funding their AI features development. Now Im using Searx and 4get cause they’re free.