• A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      1·
      13 days ago

      Not absolutely, because a company being able to deactivate your purchased property for ulterior reasons is more dystopian.

      I also suspect the rapper wasn’t exactly praising the cybertruck, so that would add “for insulting misrepresenting? a company”. That’s even more dystopian.

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    1·
    13 days ago

    Clippy moment 📎💬

    Unacceptable. It should be illegal to even build the capability to brick someone else’s property

  • mikezeman@lemmy.zip
    1·
    12 days ago

    Just wanted to say, huge props for editing the post and title when you found out it was debunked. That’s so important and too many people just don’t take that step when they learn, so upvoted for that

  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    0·
    13 days ago

    LOL registered previously in your name OR in your possession…

    So Tesla doesn’t even give a shit if the guy still owns the vehicle, they deactivated it because he owned it at one point in time.

    He could have sold it to some poor fuck who now has a bricked Cyber truck and Tesla don’t give a fuck.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    0·
    12 days ago

    The only vehicle I will ever buy is one I have full and total control over. No remote shutdown, no DRM, no limp-home mode, nothing to prevent me from using it and enjoying it.

  • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
    01·
    13 days ago

    I don’t feel bad for losers that bought Nazi cars and trucks. You should have known better. And people expect these people to go to space and not randomly kill people?