And that’s a term we haven’t applied but can apply now to technically good art following the common trends at the time, yet lacking something interesting to it, e.g. numerous portraits, template studies et cetera
You must log in or # to comment.
I believe that is just Kitsch & I would consider Corporate Memphis to be a good example
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_Memphisokay, i remember reading some copypasta at some time or other specifically going over the idea of art as a tax write off with multiple parties and levels of the whole thing involved, does anyone remember what i’m talking about? that’s obviously the insider art.
In music this tracks. There is the meta, the stadium shows and radio plays. Some good but I can’t tell how they are any better than other bands, some worse in some hard to define way, I think maybe in appealing to so many people, while it must have some quality, it also has to lack some quality though? Art shouldn’t be able to please everyone, I guess. If I can’t hate it while someone else loves it, is it art?
