• purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    At least those are not contradictory. Imagine being told that someone was dusting a room. Well that is removing small particles! But if you are dusting some icing sugar on a cake, you are adding it!

  • VeryFrugal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Homophones are definitely not the thing that makes English hard. By that definition, Chinese is downright impossible language.

  • cholesterol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Are homonyms/homophones more common in English? As a non-native speaker, I remember the vowel shift causing more trouble at first. Also, rules for shortening/combining words can be tricky. They’re/their is the obvious example. But then there’s won’t, where the apostrophe doesn’t simply substitute a letter in two words that work independently. And it’s/its is very confusing, as possessive is normally also marked with 's. Is/are is a whole new thing if your native language doesn’t distinguish.

    • alternategait@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If it helps, the possessive versions of other pronouns don’t have apostrophes (hers, his, theirs, yours), so it makes since that the possessive of it also doesn’t.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    This fails because the first one reads as “soldier” to most people, I’d say the vast majority of native English speakers would think “soldier”, not that he’s a Navy Seal. Especially because My first thought for a Navy Seal would be coming out of the ocean in a wet suit.

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think assuming a fuck up is a valid interpretation. Another explanation could be that stamps sometimes have a top that shows the final look and size of the stamp. I know that’s not usual for a wax seal, but there’s no rule saying you can’t.

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They are all seals.

      • navy seal

      • some kind of seal on a pipe

      • wood sealant

      • seal on a letter

      • seal the singer

      • seal (animal)

        • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          Same, which lead me to think the second was some sort of solder pot. So, then I thought there was some word close to soldier and solder for the third picture of the paint/stain brush that I didn’t know.

          I got the three ‘seals’ at the bottom, though.

      • waz@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        British English took over for me, It was ‘obviously’;

        Soldier, bushing, varnish.

        Seal, seal, seal.

        Couldn’t work out why the top row was with the bottom row at all.

        (There are no ‘navy seals’ to us, it’s SBS - special boat service, like SAS but bad-asser, and more secret?)

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s not fair though as navy seals are named after the animal.

    Also, you can use a word in different contexts, to seal wood and to seal something shut is similar actions

  • Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Try reading Japanese without kanji and see how rough it get with all the homophones.

    They have 3 alphabets and its called a “writing system” because of it.

  • davitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think this might work better with 4 frames since 3 of these images show items that fall under the same definition for seal since their purpose is to prevent something from getting into/out of somewhere.

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think the singer doesn’t count either since that’s someone’s name which could be anything in any language. Also the navy seal is named after the animal. It’s 2 frames. “Seal” the animal and “seal” the keep stuff in/out

  • ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Soldier, filter?, brush, wax, “there use to be a graying tower alone on the sea, you became the light on the dark side of me”, seal.