• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    There is less of a business case for late night.

    There’s been an across-the-board decline in advertisement spending nationally. A lot of media is effectively operating as a loss-leader for the tech sector, which is why you see so many dogshit Op-Eds and bizarre headline beats pumping MAG7 and their affiliates in the face of huge economic headwinds.

    What they did do earlier was decide not to fill the post-Colbert slot when their previous show ended, signalling a general move away from late-night.

    There’s some speculation that they purchased South Park with the intention of filling the Late Night slot with a much cheaper form of animated comedy. In some sense, its two-birds and one-stone. Get rid of an expensive live action comedy performance to appease the dictator’s FCC Chairman. Then line up a show so far over-the-top critical of Trump that you can’t reasonably be accused of pro-Trump bias, but that doesn’t go live until after the mid-terms.

    Play both ends against the middle. Then slop-ify your network with AI generated Skydance action movies for the MAGA folks and discount dipshit fart-comedy for the apathetic liberals.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The problem with that is that South Park could never be played on CBS. South Park has always been a cable or streaming show, letting it get away with things that you can’t do on broadcast television. Also, South Park doesn’t make nearly as many episodes to fill a late night slot. It fills an anti-Trump role, but it doesn’t fill the time slot.

      It seems like CBS didn’t want to entertain paring down The Late Show like how TBS pared down Conan.