• Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    But considering the size of the shit-heap we’re facing, I can’t help but wish it provided a bigger shovel.

    Sometimes I think we should restart it “from the scratch” - picking up the experiences and elements of the new internet, and making a new one out of it. I know it’s an idiocy (nirvana fallacy) but… I can’t help it.

    I wonder if that “new internet” would be able to preserve the privacy and anonymity of its users, while still kicking out disruptive groups - advertisers, hate groups, “we’ll DDoS you to train our model”, etc.

    • Backpack4317@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      The old Internet was just a fad until advertisers realized they could make a buck.

      Any new Internet would need to also make a buck, or more, to gain any real traction.

      • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        I wouldn’t say it was a fad, it was more like niche. Something you won’t make money out of, but with a stable base of people using it.

        And IMO it’s fine if the “new internet” doesn’t get as much traction as the current one; doubly so if both can share the same physical infrastructure.