• paraphrand@lemmy.worldEnglish
    19·
    16 days ago

    I wonder if the pixelization filter is intended to try to make it appear less like AI output.

    • Auster@thebrainbin.org
      5·
      16 days ago

      Dunno if it indeed is AI, though it does look a bit uncanny.

      But if it is, the filter sounds possible, as then it looks like some DOS-era digital drawing.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.worldEnglish
        4·
        16 days ago

        Yeah, and I’m not aware of an ai that gets pixel art pixel perfect. I don’t see any distorted pixels

        • Leonixster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          16·
          16 days ago

          Frog on the left cauldron has 2 fingers, frog in the air right in the middle has 4, the rest seem to have 3 fingers per hand and foot.

          That’s not conclusive evidence, but I think it’s worth mentioning

        • stray@pawb.social
          6·
          16 days ago

          ChatGPT/Dall-E is fully capable of having generated this.

          e: I became curious whether it would recognize its own output.

          From looking at it, this looks like a stylized illustration or meme-style cartoon, not a natural photograph.

          Illuminating.

          It did direct me to a site called imgdetector.ai though, which found 99% probability of AI generation on both this and my test image.

          • the_mighty_kracken@lemmy.world
            4·
            16 days ago

            Thanks for the website link. I got the same 99% probability rating on this image, and a 1% on four unrelated, human made images that I checked.