• Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    The liars who pushed “there isn’t enough for everyone” aren’t pushing it much anymore. They’ve moved on to saying “not everyone deserves basic human needs”—which is what they really thought all along.

  • mad_asshatter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    16 days ago

    The storage unit business is still booming, growing at over 7% annually in NA.
    We have so much shit we have to rent units offsite to store our shit.

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      And that’s happening at the same time that the square footage per capita has increased dramatically. Not only are houses bigger now, but household size (number of people living in each house) has shrunk too. That’s how much shit we got.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 days ago

        Is this happening in rural areas? I feel like in cities and suburbs there are more people living in a household. Like roommates or multiple families, because of how expensive housing is.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    15 days ago

    What’s also weird is that if you want to get rid of perfectly good things nobody wants it or anyplace that might be able to use it makes it prohibitively difficult to get it to them. Got a functional fridge? Sure, you haul it out of your house, rent a truck, take it to the receiver - oh, and it can’t be more than 10 years old.

    I find these posts that complain about waste kinda performative. While they’re not wrong, they ignore the logistical issues, both deliberate and indirect, of getting those things to the people that actually need them.

    FWIW I’ve found that putting a “curb alert” for free good items with pictures and a location works pretty well. Some industrious person will usually pick something decent up 75% of the time.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Maybe, but violence and deprivation existed long before any systems of logistical distribution or sales. Early capitalism solved some of those issues. But we’re in late stage capitalism now.

  • petrescatraian@libranet.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    I agree about the furniture, electronics and housing part. But food gets spoiled rather rapidly unfortunately. Any effort to give food away to those in need would have to move the goods quick enough.

      • petrescatraian@libranet.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        Stuff was tried and is being tried. For example, in my country, local supermarkets are giving away food that’s close to due date at a discount (mostly it’s 50%). It’s an easy way of buying food for cheap.

        • frizzo@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Bro trust me we have the means to feed and shelter every human on earth. Now ask yourself why don’t we?

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 days ago

      Any effort to give food away to those in need would have to move the goods quick enough.

      Having volunteered at a local food bank I can confidently say that it is absolutely possible to do. And not even that difficult, assuming there is a genuine will to do it.

      Annoyingly, there are still far too many companies in the food supply chain whose mindset is that they would rather trash something than allow it to get into the hands of people who need it without them paying for it.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.auOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      We have long life food, it still goes into the bin at your local supermarket.

      Food insecurity is a capitalism problem. We can supply logistics to anywhere in the world if we want. We have more than enough to feed everyone. We don’t because profit is the motivation not humanity.

    • GooseGang [she/her]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Logistically it’s a nightmare, but local food offerings in supermarkets and farmers markets are useful in reducing resources usage.

      • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 days ago

        Logistically a nightmare like having a “last chance” area where homeless and poor people can just take it before it gets thrown in the dumpster? Like, literally just allowing a space?

        We put more effort into denying homeless people a place to exist than it would take to enable them to exist.

        I know when I say “enable” people will immediately conflate that to “encourage”, but we’ve tried for decades to be as ruthless and unkind to homeless people and the numbers haven’t exactly plummeted.

        • GooseGang [she/her]@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 days ago

          I completely agree. Things like anti homeless architecture, shelter quality and the housing voucher system (and consequent rent gauging) are obscene.

          Ending homelessness would take way way less money than the current system, but the capitalist elites need a threat to barely making ends meet workers so they don’t have time or energy to worry about their neighbor.

        • petrescatraian@libranet.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          If it is something for the homeless people inside the same city, it’s fine. However, I was thinking about the scenario where food would get transported from the richer parts of the world to the poorer parts of the world. In that case, I do not see the viability of a “last chance” - part of the food would still get spoiled and thrown away, unless you want to feed the poor some spoiled food.

          I’d rather see more people educated not to buy too much food in the first place, then direct the remaining to the poor (and even, if possible, produce less in the 1st place. Have fewer cows, less agricultural land and more wild terrain (forests and the likes) if possible).

          • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            Oh, for sure transporting food across the world is a disastrously inefficient way to solve it.

            I may be wrong about this, but I dont think there are many (if any) food-poor countries that are that way because of a lack of local fertile land.

            I don’t think waste and excess are really the issue, but rather misallocation of resources, like you mentioned, raising cattle (or growing coffee/cocoa) over primary foods for profit over basic needs.

            Something-something-communism, I suppose.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.auOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 days ago

        Logistically it’s not a nightmare. We already do it, we get crops grown in country A, shipped to country B to be processed before shipping them off to country C to sell. We could easily work out to send less to C and more to D, if we wanted to.

        It’s a capitalist choice to not supply everyone.

        • GooseGang [she/her]@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 days ago

          Logistically, ie making sure the food is still fresh or good Legally (as in the US it’s illegal to give food to the homeless in some places) There are some CSR initiatives from supermarkets like Lidl but in a capitalist society it’s just not profitable for the supply chain. Maybe a nightmare is too dramatic, but highly improbable in current society as it stands.

  • discocactus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 days ago

    I call it The Treadmill. If you’re white, able-bodied, educated, motivated to play the game, etc. you can keep from falling off with what feels more or less like an easy walk. Until they speed it up. Or you get sick. Or stop playing the game.

  • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 days ago

    how much food gets thrown away just because it isn’t picturesque?

    I’ve tried growing tomatoes, and bub let me tell you, they look nothing like the pristine samples you find in grocery stores

  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 days ago

    All that old growth wood furniture… It always makes me so sad knowing that it’s essentially a semi non-renewable resource

    • Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      But it can be restored, reused, repurposed or made into something entirely different. Start woodworking and make the world a little bit better.

  • cv_octavio@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    The weird part is that the rest of us don’t simply devour those who are perpetuating this evil on almost everyone else.

    • sol6_vi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      Why doesn’t Ross, the largest friend, simply devour the others!?