SorryImLate@piefed.social to dailygames@lemmy.zipEnglish · 4 days agoClues by Sam 2026-01-08cluesbysam.comexternal-linkmessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up114arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: dailygames@lemmy.zipdailygames@lemmy.zipgames@lemmy.worlddailygames@lemmy.zipdailygames@lemmy.zipdailygames@lemmy.zipdailygames@lemmy.zipdailygames@lemmy.zipdailygames@lemmy.zip
arrow-up114arrow-down1external-linkClues by Sam 2026-01-08cluesbysam.comSorryImLate@piefed.social to dailygames@lemmy.zipEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square28linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: dailygames@lemmy.zipdailygames@lemmy.zipgames@lemmy.worlddailygames@lemmy.zipdailygames@lemmy.zipdailygames@lemmy.zipdailygames@lemmy.zipdailygames@lemmy.zipdailygames@lemmy.zip
minus-squareYiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoOk, no spoilers. But how in the fuck is this Pam’s neighbor? I complained yesterday about the logic in these puzzles, and I’ll admit I was wrong then. But I really don’t see how this follows.
minus-squareLyD@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-23 days agoEdit: you asked for no spoilers, I hope this is okay. Kind of hard to explain the logic while avoiding all spoilers. Tap for spoiler there are 2 innocents to the right of Ruby, which means there are 2 innocents and 1 criminal between Stella, Tina, and Uma. 1 innocent is Pam’s neighbour, which means Tina and Uma must be an innocent and a criminal (we won’t know which is which, yet). 1 innocent and 1 criminal are accounted for. 1 innocent is left. Who must it be?
minus-squareYiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoSpecifically, how is Stella Pam’s neighbor?
minus-squareLyD@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-23 days agoStella isn’t Pam’s neighbour, maybe it would help if you explained why you’re asking this?
minus-squareLyD@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoWhy do you think it’s saying that Stella is Pam’s neighbour?
minus-squareYiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoI am trying to not be rude
minus-squareYiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-23 days agoNo one to the right of Ruby is Pam’s neighbor. Am I tripping? Like how is everyone else getting this but me‽ This is a legit question. I feel like I’m experiencing a stroke in slow motion.
minus-squareYiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoThe first clue says explicitly that the next person is Pam’s neighbor. My first screenshot shows that the next person is very much not.
minus-squareYiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoOk, I appreciate your effort. But please expand on how I am to deduct that given the first clue?
minus-squareLyD@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoThe first clue gives two pieces of info: Two innocents to the right of Ruby Only one of those two innocents is Pam’s neighbour That means: Tap for spoiler The second innocent is NOT Pam’s neighbour
minus-squareYiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoMaybe I’m just going senile. But that really doesn’t make any sense. Stella is not Pam’s neighbor. How do you make that Olympic level leap of deduction?
Ok, no spoilers. But how in the fuck is this Pam’s neighbor?
I complained yesterday about the logic in these puzzles, and I’ll admit I was wrong then. But I really don’t see how this follows.
Edit: you asked for no spoilers, I hope this is okay. Kind of hard to explain the logic while avoiding all spoilers.
Tap for spoiler
Specifically, how is Stella Pam’s neighbor?
Stella isn’t Pam’s neighbour, maybe it would help if you explained why you’re asking this?
The very first clue.
Why do you think it’s saying that Stella is Pam’s neighbour?
I am trying to not be rude
Can you explain it with words?
No one to the right of Ruby is Pam’s neighbor. Am I tripping? Like how is everyone else getting this but me‽
This is a legit question. I feel like I’m experiencing a stroke in slow motion.
The first clue says explicitly that the next person is Pam’s neighbor.
My first screenshot shows that the next person is very much not.
Ok, I appreciate your effort. But please expand on how I am to deduct that given the first clue?
The first clue gives two pieces of info:
That means:
Tap for spoiler
The second innocent is NOT Pam’s neighbour
Maybe I’m just going senile. But that really doesn’t make any sense. Stella is not Pam’s neighbor. How do you make that Olympic level leap of deduction?