Jay Leno’s star power wasn’t enough to persuade a California legislative committee to pass a measure to allow owners of classic cars like him to be exempted from the state’s rigorous smog-check requirements.

The Assembly Appropriations Committee on Friday blocked Bakersfield Republican Sen. Shannon Grove’s Senate Bill 712 from advancing for a full vote. Leno had testified in support of the measure in Sacramento earlier this year.

  • ambitious_bones@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    With a modern car, it’s “plug in, get your money – boom – get out. It’s very quick to get a smog check with a modern car,” Leno said. “It’s not impossible in an older car, but it’s tricky. It takes time and often causes charges four, five, six times more than a regular car.” Leno said classic car owners struggle to even find a shop with the equipment needed to test them.

    So it is not even about not getting what they want, it is about being slightly inconvenienced.

    • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Wait what is ge talking about? You put the sensor in the exhaust and let it rund and then it tells you that your piece of shit car was build in a time where people believed that cigarettes are healthy

      • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 days ago

        Guys, don’t mouth off unless you know what you’re talking about.

        You sometimes need to drive hundreds of miles to get the ECU to get into it’s long-term running state and they’ll pass you.

        • KraeuterRoy@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          It sure is gonna take forever to get the right ECU data from a car made in the 40s or 50s

          • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’m sure you don’t actually know what the fuck you’re talking about.

            1999’s are 25 years old and fall under this shit.

      • DampCanary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sorry for my european ignorance,
        but isn’t eco test mandatory part of yearly vehicle inspection?

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          US states generally (possibly all) don’t do vehicle safety inspections. There are periodic smog tests and that’s about it. Detection of unfitness to be on the road is entirely reactive, based on a system of police-issued “fix it” tickets. That can range from correcting a burned-out tail light to doing something about the rusty muffler dragging on the ground.

          • azimir@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            My old city in the US didn’t even have exhaust checks. Anyone could drive anything without oversight.

        • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 days ago

          No, you live in a sensible place that at least pretends to care about the environment. America is a shit hole that has nothing sensible about it.

          • DampCanary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’d say EU rules and cash grab opportunity is behind it here (in yearly registration extension price there are eco taxes included, but coutry doesn’t guarantee that it will go thowards the eco projects. All that money ends up in general pot)

        • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          Early on in a car’s life its isn’t yearly, but at one point in my last car’s 20 year life it became yearly and never went back. I think its age related.

          • DampCanary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            That make sense, I’m just used to ours way that I didn’t question other possibilites.

            E.g. here brand new cars get their first registration (for a duration of 1 year) and after few hundred kilometers they have they 0th car service at authorised service station. Then on yearly basis cars need to go for car service (practice is: one year small, then next year large servicing) then vehicle inspection at inspection station where, if car passes minimal safety standards, you extend registration for another year.