compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoMeta appoints anti-LGBTQ+ conspiracy theorist Robby Starbuck as AI bias advisorwww.thepinknews.comexternal-linkmessage-square112linkfedilinkarrow-up1482arrow-down17cross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1475arrow-down1external-linkMeta appoints anti-LGBTQ+ conspiracy theorist Robby Starbuck as AI bias advisorwww.thepinknews.comcompostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square112linkfedilinkcross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up73arrow-down1·7 months agoWe’re in the dumbest possible timeline.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down12·7 months agoWe’re in the only timeline.
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down2·7 months agoThat doesn’t disprove my statement.
minus-squareFloodedwomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·7 months agoNo, but it knocks a little wind out of the sail.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoOK, but it’s a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we’re trying to pretend it’s just some story.
minus-squareFloodedwomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoYes, it doesn’t help that it’s an incredibly cliche piece of terminology.
minus-squareFloodedwomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoIf there’s only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter.
minus-squarecabillaud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoThat is a good example of talking to say nothing imo
We’re in the dumbest possible timeline.
We’re in the only timeline.
That doesn’t disprove my statement.
No, but it knocks a little wind out of the sail.
Not even a little.
OK, but it’s a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we’re trying to pretend it’s just some story.
Yes, it doesn’t help that it’s an incredibly cliche piece of terminology.
That too.
If there’s only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter.
That is a good example of talking to say nothing imo