I have done extrensive theoretical testing and concluded -without a shadow of doubt- that delivering a candy bar is possible

Coincedentally: the same dead pan in which he heated his frozen tea in

If only there were rates one could work out how many of currency x could be exchanged per dollar.

Sonderkraftfahrzeug 140: Flakpanzer 38(t) auf Selbstfahrlafette 38(t) Ausführung M

James Donald Bowman is the epitome of a bellend and an insult to humanity.

And I will deadname him in every thread till the day he dies.

If you want a hate binge on this topic I’d suggest watching Lindsay Ellis’ two-part piece in the hobbit trilogy.

I mean I don’t follow you, but I won’t scorn you for your opinion. I’ll gladlyhand my share of wow over to you!

Or any type of dopamine skinner box, for that matter

My comment was not directed at you personally, just that there is an overlap in filter mechanisms.

What I described can apply to multiple convictions.

The same would probably apply if someone based their entire personality around a singular idée fixe or even a particular antagonist.

Isn’t the idea behind this meme format that the simpleton and the master say the same thing verbatim?

*enthousiastically chews on a cherry tomato*

Thats not what I wrote.

One can have morals without reminding people of having that particular moral stance. One can have faith without ventilating it constantly.

But if you feel the need to berate people how they are wrong according you your moal framework and craft your core identity out of adhering to the moral ruleset it encomapasses, even dragging it into conversations that have nothing to do with it, you might have trouble of connecting with people outside of your particular dogma.

I like how the ‘voluntarily’ is a positive spin that suggests that the norm is that companies would only order a recall when pressured by a court order.

I mean it’s a good thing that they did recall it, however the norm should be that every company did that in similar situation.

It’s weirdly post-truth-ish that owning up after a mistake is seen as news worthy.

Unlike many i don’t mind people leading with their particular belief system, it’s a similar filter.

If your identity is based around a certain belief system in a way that you feel the need to include it in any conversation I can safely assume that there’s little original thought or non-dogmatic identity in there.

A name I haven’t seen in this thread is Owen Wilson. I hate his aloofness and his delivery. When combined with Ben Stiller it’s a force multiplier.

Whilst his acting is superb in that, I couldn’t finish the movie because it made me feel viscerally uncomfortably. It’s like a comedy character that has all comedy drained out, just a painful cringy cramp that won’t go away.

Still props for the acting job.

One doesn’t simply walk into bikini bottom

Neither. There’s more than one nationality here

Most of them are terrified. It’s only their news sources that mislead them about the cause of their misery.