i see, the guy who is not a doctor but sells subscription services as “diet doctor” is continuing to fund the study until the results support his business.

What does Dave Feldman have to do with the study and how did he get these preliminary results?

face smoothing is a side effect of AI upscaling, i doubt that was the goal.

are the ai models part of a peer reviewed update to the paper?

I just posted a plaque imaging study using AI analysis showing people eating the carnivore diet reversing plaque buildup by doing over a year of a strict ketogenic diet.

where does it say that in the study you linked?

as far as i can tell it says Plaque progression occurred, just wasn’t linked to ApoB or LDL-C levels.

Height of irony, RFKJr the “environmental lawyer”. Dude completely sold out to go on this anti vax crusade.

i see what you’re saying but please be careful framing it this way. The biggest reason by far for more autism diagnoses is greater awareness, access to healthcare, and expanding the criteria to less severe cases. We are simply identifying people with autism better than we used to.

13 of 20 bans for “Reason: Sockpuppet”. looks like some good modding you do over there.

where is this study? i did a brief look through your post history but you post so much keto/carnivore stuff it’s hard to spot. it’s easy to jump on the downvote persecution bandwagon without linking to it.

it doesn’t matter. ratfucker is convinced vaccines cause autism and is doing everything he can to sabotage them.

also “public for actual people who support my forum business model” is not the same as “public for AI scrapers who detract from my business model.”

I have never understood why people moved stuff to the closed Discord server system…

fucking everything kind of sucks right now.

I thought they were angling for Syd and Marcus to be a thing.

well if anything good comes from AI maybe it will be a resurgence of unions.

pretty sure any b list actor would be forced to do the same shit.

its not just that. i guess you will see what i mean when you watch.

ground.news is trying to attack this issue. they post topics and how widely covered each is left/right/center, factuality, etc

television?

Up to this point I found Prater’s credulity with Red/Dexter to be stretching the limits of believeability for a supposedly smart guy. Glad that seems to be coming to an end. I feel like it would have made more sense if Prater was the skeptical one and Charley defensive about the work she did to vet Red.