

Yes, but it is typically used for milk, like so:
Yes, but it is typically used for milk, like so:
The kind that requires this implement:
I’ll even help mix the Kool-aid!
I think I’ll continue to enjoy my pseudonymity for the time being. Besides, I could link you to some rando’s modules, claim to be that person, and you’d have no way of verifying anyhow since this nick has no resemblance to the handle I used. But let’s just say, I shipped well-tested, thoroughly documented modules with very high “kwalitee” used by fortune 100 companies.
Processors change? Non-sequitur. Spectre an its ilk arrived on the scene at least a decade after MS had developed a reputation for shipping shit code.
Libraries become deprecated or vulnerable? Non-sequitur. Whose libraries? Who deprecated them? Remember, this is a company that personified Embrace, Extend, Extinguish. If they picked shitty vendors for libraries and did no due diligence on that source code, why are the externalities foisted upon users? Also, libraries don’t “become vulnerable” through some magical process. Either the bug was there from the beginning, or a shitty change was introduced and not caught.
Design paradigms shift? And this is an excuse for writing shitty code? I don’t buy it.
New integrations require new code and that means taking into consideration the new shape of the system. Sounds like they did a really shitty job of that and they make it the user’s problem.
Should we blame the old house builders for using asbestos? Unequivocally, yes. Those shitheads knew or should have known. Don’t believe me? Here is a handy link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500224003623
Do note the decades between when it was understood the shit was dangerous and when the decline as a building material happened.
So, no, MS still does not get a pass.
False dichotomy. That was a business decision with externalities foisted upon users.
Go ahead, bro. It’s on CPAN.
Why did they write such shit software in the first place? No, they don’t get off the hook.
It would be a real shame for Lawrence to get Luigi’d
I think the reason it’s hard to find a good answer is that their opinions aren’t based on anything logical, just whatever they’re told to believe at the moment. A person with no truly held convictions cannot be right about anything.
This isn’t too far from what has been researched. Take a gander: https://theauthoritarians.org/
Wait, him as the star or merely a participant?
Almost looks like proper squat technique
Except I have never encountered a modal with “maybe later” that wasn’t some bullshit product manager’s fever dream. No, they do not get the benefit of the doubt.
1 star:
“digital panhandler for stars”
100 bucks says that down-y eared bunny nibbled on the wooden grip of that revolver
literal dutch translations are hilarious
how stupid you make yourself look🤣
reaching so hard to insult the entire opposing political population
So, are you included in this set? Is that why you’re white-knighting here against a throw away joke? Do you… breathe through your mouth?
without realizing there is no actual text to read that is affected by the color scheme
Bro, do you even legend?
Or am I arguing with someones shitty prompt fed to a slop machine?
How else would the mouth breathers know which team belongs to which line? You expect them to read?
Thanks for translating from britbong
Welcome to the internet!
This is common lore 😉