• Wudi@feddit.ukOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Remember this?

    Or this?

    The chickens are coming home to roost

      • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s better than that.

        Ford has been in power since 2018. In his first two years, his admin advocated for and pushed through legislation specifically to allow speed cameras to be installed in municipalities. This may have been leftover legislative planning from the previous party, but in either case it rode through with conservative favour.

        Political interests have since shifted, and with his most recent term as Premier, he’s been loudly admonishing any municipality that installs speed cameras, bike lanes or other traffic calming measures because he’s parroting nonsense about how it restricts traffic in high density areas and is making a stink about how it all just increases congestion.

        It’s dangerous, stupid and frustrating. He’s made threats to municipalities thay don’t agree with his declarations, attempting to deny typical grants allocated to improving infrastructure in smaller regions.

      • BillyClark@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        To be fair, there are problems with speed cameras that we’ve seen in the US, so probably similar problems exist in Canada. For example, they’re often outsourced to private companies, and there are privacy and accuracy concerns. Local governments with access to speed cameras can make a lot of money from speed traps, and so they have a financial incentive to make the road harder to drive on, when they should be making roads easier to drive on. People sometimes see speed cameras and slam their brakes, which can cause all sorts of problems.

        Usually, the better way to control speed is to design your roads to naturally be a certain speed. Some ways you can do this is by controlling the width of the lanes, the length of the lines in the lane dividers, and the curve of the road.

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It’s one thing to ban bicycle lanes, but something else to ban speed cameras. The issue I have with speed cameras is how they are used for surveillance and tracking. In that case the people deserve public access to the data.

    • webpack@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      not sure if opening camera data to the pubic is the solution, wouldn’t that just let anyone track anyone?

    • egerlach@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Ummm… those are unfortunately the same part. The 905-belt is historically quite conservative. It’s the suburbs, which is where (many) people live.

  • Pipea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    For the second time so far too! Everyone forgets how Mike Harris got elected upon the simple promise he would ban “photo-radar” as it was called then. Just like the truck speed limiters, people go apeshit when you restrict their driving speed. Bring back speed cams, slap a 105 km/h limiter on ALL vehicles! Bring it the fuck on!