cm0002@suppo.fi to Comics@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 days agoOut of the frying pan and into the firesuppo.fiimagemessage-square21linkfedilinkarrow-up1202arrow-down152
arrow-up1150arrow-down1imageOut of the frying pan and into the firesuppo.ficm0002@suppo.fi to Comics@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 days agomessage-square21linkfedilink
minus-squareyellow [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·11 days agoWho’s the artist of this comic?
minus-squareparaphrand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·11 days agoI wonder if the pixelization filter is intended to try to make it appear less like AI output.
minus-squareAuster@thebrainbin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5·11 days agoDunno if it indeed is AI, though it does look a bit uncanny. But if it is, the filter sounds possible, as then it looks like some DOS-era digital drawing.
minus-squareparaphrand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 days agoYeah, and I’m not aware of an ai that gets pixel art pixel perfect. I don’t see any distorted pixels
minus-squareLeonixster@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up16·11 days agoFrog on the left cauldron has 2 fingers, frog in the air right in the middle has 4, the rest seem to have 3 fingers per hand and foot. That’s not conclusive evidence, but I think it’s worth mentioning
minus-squaredependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·11 days agoAlso frog I. The air on the right seems to have none on left leg.
minus-squarestray@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-211 days agoChatGPT/Dall-E is fully capable of having generated this. e: I became curious whether it would recognize its own output. From looking at it, this looks like a stylized illustration or meme-style cartoon, not a natural photograph. Illuminating. It did direct me to a site called imgdetector.ai though, which found 99% probability of AI generation on both this and my test image.
minus-squarethe_mighty_kracken@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·11 days agoThanks for the website link. I got the same 99% probability rating on this image, and a 1% on four unrelated, human made images that I checked.
minus-squaretetris11@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-211 days agoShow me the artefacts, it looks normal to me Edit: I read the other replies
Who’s the artist of this comic?
AI
I wonder if the pixelization filter is intended to try to make it appear less like AI output.
Dunno if it indeed is AI, though it does look a bit uncanny.
But if it is, the filter sounds possible, as then it looks like some DOS-era digital drawing.
Yeah, and I’m not aware of an ai that gets pixel art pixel perfect. I don’t see any distorted pixels
Frog on the left cauldron has 2 fingers, frog in the air right in the middle has 4, the rest seem to have 3 fingers per hand and foot.
That’s not conclusive evidence, but I think it’s worth mentioning
Also frog I. The air on the right seems to have none on left leg.
ChatGPT/Dall-E is fully capable of having generated this.
e: I became curious whether it would recognize its own output.
Illuminating.
It did direct me to a site called imgdetector.ai though, which found 99% probability of AI generation on both this and my test image.
Thanks for the website link. I got the same 99% probability rating on this image, and a 1% on four unrelated, human made images that I checked.
The text is the give away.
Figures
Show me the artefacts, it looks normal to me
Edit: I read the other replies